TSTP Solution File: NUM514+3 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : NUM514+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:14:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.38s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
( ( aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
& xn = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xn,xr)) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) = sdtasdt0(xp,X1) )
| doDivides0(xp,sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__2613,hypothesis,
( aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xk,xr))
& xk = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xk,xr))
& aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
& xn = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
& sdtasdt0(xp,sdtsldt0(xk,xr)) = sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2613) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
& xn = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xn,xr)) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
& sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) = sdtasdt0(xp,X1) )
| doDivides0(xp,sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X31] :
( aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
& xn = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
& ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X31)
| sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) != sdtasdt0(xp,X31) )
& ~ doDivides0(xp,sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) != sdtasdt0(xp,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xp,sdtsldt0(xk,xr)) = sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2613]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xk,xr)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2613]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : NUM514+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon May 20 06:52:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.38/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # new_bool_3 with pid 9142 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.38/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/0.55 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 163s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 9146 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.38/0.55 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/0.55 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.55 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 163s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.38/0.55
% 0.38/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.38/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 56
% 0.38/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.38/0.55 # Initial clauses : 276
% 0.38/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.38/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 273
% 0.38/0.55 # Processed clauses : 356
% 0.38/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.38/0.55 # ...subsumed : 9
% 0.38/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 336
% 0.38/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 0.38/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.38/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.38/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.38/0.55 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.38/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 8
% 0.38/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.38/0.55 # ...of those cached : 14
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 73
% 0.38/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 44
% 0.38/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 16
% 0.38/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.38/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 182
% 0.38/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 1533
% 0.38/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 255
% 0.38/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35352
% 0.38/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 212
% 0.38/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.38/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 147
% 0.38/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.38/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 22566
% 0.38/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2439
% 0.38/0.55
% 0.38/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.55 # User time : 0.037 s
% 0.38/0.55 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Total time : 0.041 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 2384 pages
% 0.38/0.55
% 0.38/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.55 # User time : 0.039 s
% 0.38/0.55 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Total time : 0.046 s
% 0.38/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
% 0.38/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.38/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------