TSTP Solution File: NUM505+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM505+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:51:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 10.16s 3.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   34
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  11 unt;  30 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  12   ~;   9   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   34 (  17   >;  17   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   25 (  25 usr;  13 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (;   4   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sdtlseqdt0 > iLess0 > doDivides0 > isPrime0 > aNaturalNumber0 > sdtsldt0 > sdtpldt0 > sdtmndt0 > sdtasdt0 > #nlpp > xr > xp > xn > xm > xk > sz10 > sz00 > #skF_4 > #skF_11 > #skF_6 > #skF_10 > #skF_14 > #skF_13 > #skF_5 > #skF_9 > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_8 > #skF_1 > #skF_12

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(xk,type,
    xk: $i ).

tff(xr,type,
    xr: $i ).

tff(sdtasdt0,type,
    sdtasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sz10,type,
    sz10: $i ).

tff(sdtmndt0,type,
    sdtmndt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sdtlseqdt0,type,
    sdtlseqdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sz00,type,
    sz00: $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(sdtpldt0,type,
    sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(isPrime0,type,
    isPrime0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff(aNaturalNumber0,type,
    aNaturalNumber0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(doDivides0,type,
    doDivides0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xp,type,
    xp: $i ).

tff(iLess0,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xm,type,
    xm: $i ).

tff(sdtsldt0,type,
    sdtsldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xn,type,
    xn: $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i ).

tff(f_608,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( ? [W0] :
              ( aNaturalNumber0(W0)
              & ( sdtpldt0(xp,W0) = xk ) )
          | sdtlseqdt0(xp,xk) )
     => ( ( xk != xp )
        & ( ? [W0] :
              ( aNaturalNumber0(W0)
              & ( sdtpldt0(xk,W0) = xp ) )
          | sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(f_540,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(xk)
    & ( sdtasdt0(xn,xm) = sdtasdt0(xp,xk) )
    & ( xk = sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xp) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2306) ).

tff(f_423,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(xn)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xm)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xp) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1837) ).

tff(f_212,axiom,
    ! [W0,W1] :
      ( ( aNaturalNumber0(W0)
        & aNaturalNumber0(W1) )
     => ( sdtlseqdt0(W0,W1)
        | ( ( W1 != W0 )
          & sdtlseqdt0(W1,W0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mLETotal) ).

tff(c_487,plain,
    ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp)
    | ( xp = xk ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_608]) ).

tff(c_494,plain,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_487]) ).

tff(c_445,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(xk),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_540]) ).

tff(c_143,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(xp),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_423]) ).

tff(c_3867,plain,
    ! [W1_153,W0_154] :
      ( sdtlseqdt0(W1_153,W0_154)
      | sdtlseqdt0(W0_154,W1_153)
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(W1_153)
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(W0_154) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_212]) ).

tff(c_483,plain,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp,xk),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_608]) ).

tff(c_3877,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(xp)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(xk) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3867,c_483]) ).

tff(c_3896,plain,
    sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_445,c_143,c_3877]) ).

tff(c_3898,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_494,c_3896]) ).

tff(c_3899,plain,
    xp = xk,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_487]) ).

tff(c_3904,plain,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(xk,xk),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3899,c_483]) ).

tff(c_3900,plain,
    sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_487]) ).

tff(c_3964,plain,
    sdtlseqdt0(xk,xk),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3899,c_3900]) ).

tff(c_3965,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_3904,c_3964]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM505+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:30:22 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.16/3.36  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.16/3.37  
% 10.16/3.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.16/3.39  
% 10.16/3.39  Inference rules
% 10.16/3.39  ----------------------
% 10.16/3.39  #Ref     : 0
% 10.16/3.39  #Sup     : 885
% 10.16/3.39  #Fact    : 2
% 10.16/3.39  #Define  : 0
% 10.16/3.40  #Split   : 2
% 10.16/3.40  #Chain   : 0
% 10.16/3.40  #Close   : 0
% 10.16/3.40  
% 10.16/3.40  Ordering : KBO
% 10.16/3.40  
% 10.16/3.40  Simplification rules
% 10.16/3.40  ----------------------
% 10.16/3.40  #Subsume      : 183
% 10.16/3.40  #Demod        : 787
% 10.16/3.40  #Tautology    : 333
% 10.16/3.40  #SimpNegUnit  : 13
% 10.16/3.40  #BackRed      : 9
% 10.16/3.40  
% 10.16/3.40  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 10.16/3.40  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 10.16/3.40  
% 10.16/3.40  Timing (in seconds)
% 10.16/3.40  ----------------------
% 10.16/3.40  Preprocessing        : 0.82
% 10.16/3.40  Parsing              : 0.37
% 10.16/3.40  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 10.16/3.40  Main loop            : 1.52
% 10.16/3.40  Inferencing          : 0.37
% 10.16/3.40  Reduction            : 0.54
% 10.16/3.40  Demodulation         : 0.37
% 10.16/3.40  BG Simplification    : 0.09
% 10.16/3.40  Subsumption          : 0.45
% 10.16/3.40  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 10.16/3.40  MUC search           : 0.00
% 10.16/3.40  Cooper               : 0.00
% 10.16/3.40  Total                : 2.39
% 10.16/3.40  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 10.16/3.40  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 10.16/3.40  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 10.16/3.40  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------