TSTP Solution File: NUM477+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM477+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.98s 2.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 13 unt; 2 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 10 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_47,plain,
( X1 = sz00
| sdtlseqdt0(X2,sdtasdt0(X2,X1))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_47) ).
cnf(i_0_63,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xm,esk3_0) = xn,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_63) ).
cnf(i_0_60,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_60) ).
cnf(i_0_64,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_64) ).
cnf(i_0_65,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_65) ).
cnf(i_0_16,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,sz00) = sz00
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_61,hypothesis,
sz00 != xn,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_61) ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( X1 = sz00
| sdtlseqdt0(X2,sdtasdt0(X2,X1))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_47 ).
cnf(c_0_74,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xm,esk3_0) = xn,
i_0_63 ).
cnf(c_0_75,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
i_0_60 ).
cnf(c_0_76,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(esk3_0),
i_0_64 ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn),
i_0_65 ).
cnf(c_0_78,hypothesis,
esk3_0 = sz00,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),c_0_75]),c_0_76])]),c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,sz00) = sz00
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_80,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xm,sz00) = xn,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_78]) ).
cnf(c_0_81,hypothesis,
sz00 != xn,
i_0_61 ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]),c_0_75])]),c_0_81]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.14 % Problem : NUM477+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 17:02:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.48 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.98/2.57 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.98/2.57 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.98/2.57 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.98/2.57 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S068N
% 8.98/2.57 # and selection function PSelectNewComplexAHP.
% 8.98/2.57 #
% 8.98/2.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 8.98/2.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.98/2.57
% 8.98/2.57 # Proof found!
% 8.98/2.57 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.98/2.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.98/2.57 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.98/2.57
% 8.98/2.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.98/2.57 # User time : 0.036 s
% 8.98/2.57 # System time : 0.007 s
% 8.98/2.57 # Total time : 0.043 s
% 8.98/2.57 # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 8.98/2.57
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------