TSTP Solution File: NUM477+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUM477+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.98s 2.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  13 unt;   2 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (  10 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_47,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | sdtlseqdt0(X2,sdtasdt0(X2,X1))
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(i_0_63,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xm,esk3_0) = xn,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_63) ).

cnf(i_0_60,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_60) ).

cnf(i_0_64,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_64) ).

cnf(i_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_65) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sz00) = sz00
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_61,hypothesis,
    sz00 != xn,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4tapliq8/input.p',i_0_61) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | sdtlseqdt0(X2,sdtasdt0(X2,X1))
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_74,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xm,esk3_0) = xn,
    i_0_63 ).

cnf(c_0_75,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    i_0_60 ).

cnf(c_0_76,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(esk3_0),
    i_0_64 ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn),
    i_0_65 ).

cnf(c_0_78,hypothesis,
    esk3_0 = sz00,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),c_0_75]),c_0_76])]),c_0_77]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sz00) = sz00
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_80,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xm,sz00) = xn,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_78]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,hypothesis,
    sz00 != xn,
    i_0_61 ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]),c_0_75])]),c_0_81]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.14  % Problem  : NUM477+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.37  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.37  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 17:02:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.98/2.57  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.98/2.57  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.98/2.57  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.98/2.57  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S068N
% 8.98/2.57  # and selection function PSelectNewComplexAHP.
% 8.98/2.57  #
% 8.98/2.57  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 8.98/2.57  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.98/2.57  
% 8.98/2.57  # Proof found!
% 8.98/2.57  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.98/2.57  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.98/2.57  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.98/2.57  
% 8.98/2.57  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.98/2.57  # User time                : 0.036 s
% 8.98/2.57  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 8.98/2.57  # Total time               : 0.043 s
% 8.98/2.57  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 8.98/2.57  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------