TSTP Solution File: NUM393+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUM393+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:41:42 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.73s 0.90s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  103 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  120 (  52   ~;  39   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (  32   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f105,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f104,f59]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ordinal(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ( ~ inclusion_comparable(sK0,sK1)
    & ordinal(sK1)
    & ordinal(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f40,f52,f51]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( ~ inclusion_comparable(X0,X1)
            & ordinal(X1) )
        & ordinal(X0) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( ~ inclusion_comparable(sK0,X1)
          & ordinal(X1) )
      & ordinal(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( ~ inclusion_comparable(sK0,X1)
        & ordinal(X1) )
   => ( ~ inclusion_comparable(sK0,sK1)
      & ordinal(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ~ inclusion_comparable(X0,X1)
          & ordinal(X1) )
      & ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ordinal(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ordinal(X1)
           => inclusion_comparable(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ordinal(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ordinal(X1)
         => inclusion_comparable(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t25_ordinal1) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ~ ordinal(sK0),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f103,f60]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ordinal(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ( ~ ordinal(sK1)
    | ~ ordinal(sK0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f101,f94]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ~ ordinal_subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f93,f59]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ( ~ ordinal_subset(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ ordinal(sK0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f91,f60]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( ~ ordinal_subset(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ ordinal(sK1)
    | ~ ordinal(sK0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f63,f86]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ~ subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolution,[],[f75,f61]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ~ inclusion_comparable(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( inclusion_comparable(X0,X1)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( inclusion_comparable(X0,X1)
        | ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
          & ~ subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( subset(X1,X0)
        | subset(X0,X1)
        | ~ inclusion_comparable(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( inclusion_comparable(X0,X1)
        | ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
          & ~ subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( subset(X1,X0)
        | subset(X0,X1)
        | ~ inclusion_comparable(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( inclusion_comparable(X0,X1)
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_xboole_0) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
          | ~ subset(X0,X1) )
        & ( subset(X0,X1)
          | ~ ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ) )
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      <=> subset(X0,X1) )
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      <=> subset(X0,X1) )
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ordinal(X1)
        & ordinal(X0) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      <=> subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ( ordinal_subset(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ ordinal(sK1)
    | ~ ordinal(sK0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f96,f68]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ordinal(X1)
        & ordinal(X0) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
        | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',connectedness_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ~ ordinal_subset(sK1,sK0),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f95,f60]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( ~ ordinal_subset(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ ordinal(sK1) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f92,f59]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( ~ ordinal_subset(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ ordinal(sK0)
    | ~ ordinal(sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f63,f87]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ~ subset(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f76,f61]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( inclusion_comparable(X0,X1)
      | ~ subset(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : NUM393+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 04:51:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.37  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/0.90  % (16715)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16714)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16719)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16718)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.90  
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)Memory used [KB]: 969
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16720)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.90  
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)Memory used [KB]: 969
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16716)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.90  
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)Memory used [KB]: 970
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16718)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16720)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)First to succeed.
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16717)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16716)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.73/0.90  
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)Memory used [KB]: 1051
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16717)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16719)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-16711"
% 0.73/0.90  % (16715)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.73/0.90  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.73/0.90  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)------------------------------
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.73/0.90  
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)Memory used [KB]: 985
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.73/0.90  % (16713)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.73/0.90  % (16711)Success in time 0.528 s
% 0.73/0.90  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------