TSTP Solution File: NUM393+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUM393+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:35:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.58s 2.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  10 unt;   4 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   39 (   0 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( ordinal_subset(X1,X2)
    | ordinal_subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-goelifim/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk14_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-goelifim/lgb.p',i_0_54) ).

cnf(i_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk13_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-goelifim/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inclusion_comparable(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-goelifim/lgb.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-goelifim/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_47,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ ordinal(X2)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-goelifim/lgb.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-goelifim/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( ordinal_subset(X1,X2)
    | ordinal_subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X2) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk14_0),
    i_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal_subset(X1,esk14_0)
    | ordinal_subset(esk14_0,X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk13_0),
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inclusion_comparable(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ ordinal(X2)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal_subset(esk14_0,esk13_0)
    | ordinal_subset(esk13_0,esk14_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk14_0,esk13_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ordinal_subset(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]),c_0_66]),c_0_64])]),c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_73]),c_0_64]),c_0_66])]),c_0_74]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : NUM393+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 00:19:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.58/2.33  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.58/2.33  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.58/2.33  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.58/2.33  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.58/2.33  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.58/2.33  #
% 7.58/2.33  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 7.58/2.33  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.58/2.33  
% 7.58/2.33  # Proof found!
% 7.58/2.33  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.58/2.33  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.58/2.33  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.58/2.33  
% 7.58/2.33  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.58/2.33  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 7.58/2.33  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.58/2.33  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 7.58/2.33  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.58/2.33  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------