TSTP Solution File: NUM393+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : NUM393+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:21:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.81s 0.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : NUM393+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 10:49:52 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.81/0.86  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.86  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.81/0.86  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.81/0.86  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.81/0.86  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.81/0.86  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.81/0.86  
% 0.81/0.86  % Result      :Theorem 0.210000s
% 0.81/0.86  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.210000s
% 0.81/0.86  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.87  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.87  % File     : NUM393+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.81/0.87  % Domain   : Number Theory (Ordinals)
% 0.81/0.87  % Problem  : Ordinal numbers, theorem 25
% 0.81/0.87  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.81/0.87  % English  :
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  % Refs     : [Ban90] Bancerek (1990), The Ordinal Numbers
% 0.81/0.87  %            [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.81/0.87  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.81/0.87  % Names    : ordinal1__t25_ordinal1 [Urb06]
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.81/0.87  % Rating   : 0.11 v8.1.0, 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.04 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.4.0, 0.11 v3.3.0, 0.07 v3.2.0
% 0.81/0.87  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   6 unt;   0 def)
% 0.81/0.87  %            Number of atoms       :   91 (   2 equ)
% 0.81/0.87  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.81/0.87  %            Number of connectives :   61 (   7   ~;   3   |;  32   &)
% 0.81/0.87  %                                         (   3 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.81/0.87  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
% 0.81/0.87  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.81/0.87  %            Number of predicates  :   15 (  14 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.81/0.87  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.81/0.87  %            Number of variables   :   53 (  41   !;  12   ?)
% 0.81/0.87  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.81/0.87  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.81/0.87  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.87  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( in(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(cc1_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87       => function(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(cc1_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ordinal(A)
% 0.81/0.87       => ( epsilon_transitive(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & epsilon_connected(A) ) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(cc1_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87       => relation(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(cc2_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ( relation(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & function(A) )
% 0.81/0.87       => ( relation(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & function(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & one_to_one(A) ) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(cc2_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ( epsilon_transitive(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & epsilon_connected(A) )
% 0.81/0.87       => ordinal(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(connectedness_r1_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ( ordinal(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & ordinal(B) )
% 0.81/0.87       => ( ordinal_subset(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87          | ordinal_subset(B,A) ) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(d9_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( inclusion_comparable(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87      <=> ( subset(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87          | subset(B,A) ) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(existence_m1_subset_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A] :
% 0.81/0.87      ? [B] : element(B,A) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(fc12_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ( empty(empty_set)
% 0.81/0.87      & relation(empty_set)
% 0.81/0.87      & relation_empty_yielding(empty_set) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(fc4_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ( empty(empty_set)
% 0.81/0.87      & relation(empty_set) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc1_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( relation(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc1_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( epsilon_transitive(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & epsilon_connected(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & ordinal(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc1_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & relation(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc2_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( relation(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc2_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ~ empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & relation(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc3_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( relation(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & function(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & one_to_one(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc3_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( relation(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & relation_empty_yielding(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc4_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( relation(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & relation_empty_yielding(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(rc5_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ? [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( relation(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & relation_non_empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(redefinition_r1_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ( ordinal(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & ordinal(B) )
% 0.81/0.87       => ( ordinal_subset(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87        <=> subset(A,B) ) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(reflexivity_r1_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ( ordinal(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & ordinal(B) )
% 0.81/0.87       => ordinal_subset(A,A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] : subset(A,A) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(reflexivity_r3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] : inclusion_comparable(A,A) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(symmetry_r3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( inclusion_comparable(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87       => inclusion_comparable(B,A) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t1_subset,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( in(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87       => element(A,B) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t25_ordinal1,conjecture,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ordinal(A)
% 0.81/0.87       => ! [B] :
% 0.81/0.87            ( ordinal(B)
% 0.81/0.87           => inclusion_comparable(A,B) ) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t2_subset,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( element(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87       => ( empty(B)
% 0.81/0.87          | in(A,B) ) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t3_subset,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( element(A,powerset(B))
% 0.81/0.87      <=> subset(A,B) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t4_subset,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( ( in(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87          & element(B,powerset(C)) )
% 0.81/0.87       => element(A,C) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t5_subset,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.81/0.87        ~ ( in(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87          & element(B,powerset(C))
% 0.81/0.87          & empty(C) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t6_boole,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A] :
% 0.81/0.87        ( empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87       => A = empty_set ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t7_boole,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ~ ( in(A,B)
% 0.81/0.87          & empty(B) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  fof(t8_boole,axiom,
% 0.81/0.87      ! [A,B] :
% 0.81/0.87        ~ ( empty(A)
% 0.81/0.87          & A != B
% 0.81/0.87          & empty(B) ) ).
% 0.81/0.87  
% 0.81/0.87  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.87  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.87  % Proof found
% 0.81/0.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.81/0.88  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.81/0.88  %ClaNum:85(EqnAxiom:24)
% 0.81/0.88  %VarNum:102(SingletonVarNum:46)
% 0.81/0.88  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.81/0.88  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.81/0.88  %SharedTerms:45
% 0.81/0.88  %goalClause: 37 38 61
% 0.81/0.88  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.81/0.88  [27]P1(a1)
% 0.81/0.88  [28]P1(a2)
% 0.81/0.88  [29]P1(a11)
% 0.81/0.88  [30]P1(a12)
% 0.81/0.88  [31]P3(a3)
% 0.81/0.88  [32]P3(a12)
% 0.81/0.88  [33]P3(a13)
% 0.81/0.88  [34]P3(a4)
% 0.81/0.88  [35]P3(a6)
% 0.81/0.88  [36]P6(a10)
% 0.81/0.88  [37]P6(a7)
% 0.81/0.88  [38]P6(a8)
% 0.81/0.88  [39]P4(a10)
% 0.81/0.88  [40]P5(a10)
% 0.81/0.88  [42]P10(a1)
% 0.81/0.88  [43]P10(a3)
% 0.81/0.88  [44]P10(a2)
% 0.81/0.88  [45]P10(a12)
% 0.81/0.88  [46]P10(a14)
% 0.81/0.88  [47]P10(a13)
% 0.81/0.88  [48]P10(a5)
% 0.81/0.88  [49]P10(a4)
% 0.81/0.88  [50]P10(a6)
% 0.81/0.88  [51]P7(a13)
% 0.81/0.88  [52]P12(a1)
% 0.81/0.88  [53]P12(a5)
% 0.81/0.88  [54]P12(a4)
% 0.81/0.88  [55]P13(a6)
% 0.81/0.88  [59]~P1(a14)
% 0.81/0.88  [60]~P1(a15)
% 0.81/0.88  [61]~P8(a7,a8)
% 0.81/0.88  [56]P8(x561,x561)
% 0.81/0.88  [57]P14(x571,x571)
% 0.81/0.88  [58]P2(f9(x581),x581)
% 0.81/0.88  [62]~P1(x621)+E(x621,a1)
% 0.81/0.88  [63]~P1(x631)+P3(x631)
% 0.81/0.88  [64]~P6(x641)+P4(x641)
% 0.81/0.88  [65]~P6(x651)+P5(x651)
% 0.81/0.88  [66]~P1(x661)+P10(x661)
% 0.81/0.88  [71]~P1(x711)+~P9(x712,x711)
% 0.81/0.88  [72]~P8(x722,x721)+P8(x721,x722)
% 0.81/0.88  [73]~P14(x732,x731)+P8(x731,x732)
% 0.81/0.88  [74]~P14(x741,x742)+P8(x741,x742)
% 0.81/0.88  [75]~P9(x751,x752)+P2(x751,x752)
% 0.81/0.88  [79]~P9(x792,x791)+~P9(x791,x792)
% 0.81/0.88  [77]~P14(x771,x772)+P2(x771,f16(x772))
% 0.81/0.88  [80]P14(x801,x802)+~P2(x801,f16(x802))
% 0.81/0.88  [68]~P4(x681)+~P5(x681)+P6(x681)
% 0.81/0.88  [67]~P1(x672)+~P1(x671)+E(x671,x672)
% 0.81/0.88  [70]~P6(x701)+P11(x701,x701)+~P6(x702)
% 0.81/0.88  [76]~P2(x762,x761)+P1(x761)+P9(x762,x761)
% 0.81/0.88  [83]P14(x832,x831)+~P8(x832,x831)+P14(x831,x832)
% 0.81/0.88  [84]~P1(x841)+~P9(x842,x843)+~P2(x843,f16(x841))
% 0.81/0.88  [85]P2(x851,x852)+~P9(x851,x853)+~P2(x853,f16(x852))
% 0.81/0.88  [69]~P1(x691)+~P3(x691)+~P10(x691)+P7(x691)
% 0.81/0.88  [78]P11(x782,x781)+~P6(x781)+~P6(x782)+P11(x781,x782)
% 0.81/0.88  [81]~P6(x812)+~P6(x811)+~P14(x811,x812)+P11(x811,x812)
% 0.81/0.88  [82]~P6(x822)+~P6(x821)+~P11(x821,x822)+P14(x821,x822)
% 0.81/0.88  %EqnAxiom
% 0.81/0.88  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.81/0.88  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.81/0.88  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.81/0.88  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f9(x41),f9(x42))
% 0.81/0.88  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f16(x51),f16(x52))
% 0.81/0.88  [6]~P1(x61)+P1(x62)+~E(x61,x62)
% 0.81/0.88  [7]P2(x72,x73)+~E(x71,x72)+~P2(x71,x73)
% 0.81/0.88  [8]P2(x83,x82)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x83,x81)
% 0.81/0.88  [9]P9(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P9(x91,x93)
% 0.81/0.88  [10]P9(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P9(x103,x101)
% 0.81/0.88  [11]P11(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P11(x111,x113)
% 0.81/0.88  [12]P11(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P11(x123,x121)
% 0.81/0.88  [13]P14(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P14(x131,x133)
% 0.81/0.88  [14]P14(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P14(x143,x141)
% 0.81/0.88  [15]~P6(x151)+P6(x152)+~E(x151,x152)
% 0.81/0.88  [16]~P3(x161)+P3(x162)+~E(x161,x162)
% 0.81/0.88  [17]~P10(x171)+P10(x172)+~E(x171,x172)
% 0.81/0.88  [18]~P5(x181)+P5(x182)+~E(x181,x182)
% 0.81/0.88  [19]P8(x192,x193)+~E(x191,x192)+~P8(x191,x193)
% 0.81/0.88  [20]P8(x203,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P8(x203,x201)
% 0.81/0.88  [21]~P4(x211)+P4(x212)+~E(x211,x212)
% 0.81/0.88  [22]~P12(x221)+P12(x222)+~E(x221,x222)
% 0.81/0.88  [23]~P7(x231)+P7(x232)+~E(x231,x232)
% 0.81/0.88  [24]~P13(x241)+P13(x242)+~E(x241,x242)
% 0.81/0.88  
% 0.81/0.88  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(86,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (~P14(a7,a8)),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[61,74])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(87,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (~P14(a8,a7)),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[61,74,73])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(93,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (P2(f9(x931),x931)),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(rename_variables,[],[58])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(113,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (P3(a1)),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,56,57,38,61,27,29,30,32,45,59,58,93,74,73,72,71,80,20,13,76,81,78,69,79,66,65,64,63])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(126,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (~P2(a14,f16(a1))),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,56,57,38,61,27,28,29,30,32,36,45,55,59,58,93,74,73,72,71,80,20,13,76,81,78,69,79,66,65,64,63,62,77,5,4,24,10,6,70,84])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(128,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (~P11(a7,a8)),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,56,57,38,61,27,28,29,30,32,36,45,55,59,58,93,74,73,72,71,80,20,13,76,81,78,69,79,66,65,64,63,62,77,5,4,24,10,6,70,84,82])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(130,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (E(a1,a2)),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,56,57,38,61,27,28,29,30,32,36,45,55,59,58,93,74,73,72,71,80,20,13,76,81,78,69,79,66,65,64,63,62,77,5,4,24,10,6,70,84,82,2])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(148,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (~P2(a7,f16(a8))),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[52,86,113,130,22,16,80])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(152,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     (P11(a8,a7)),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,52,38,126,86,113,128,130,22,16,80,77,78])).
% 0.81/0.88  cnf(417,plain,
% 0.81/0.88     ($false),
% 0.81/0.88     inference(scs_inference,[],[87,148,152,38,37,75,82]),
% 0.81/0.88     ['proof']).
% 0.81/0.88  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.81/0.88  % Total time :0.210000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------