TSTP Solution File: NUM387+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : NUM387+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:35:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.77s 1.94s
% Output : Refutation 1.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 19 ~; 10 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
! [A,B] :
( in(A,B)
=> ~ in(B,A) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
fof(c125,plain,
! [A,B] :
( in(A,B)
=> ~ in(B,A) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_r2_hidden]) ).
fof(c126,plain,
! [A,B] :
( ~ in(A,B)
| ~ in(B,A) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c125]) ).
fof(c127,plain,
! [X40,X41] :
( ~ in(X40,X41)
| ~ in(X41,X40) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c126]) ).
cnf(c128,plain,
( ~ in(X99,X100)
| ~ in(X100,X99) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c127]) ).
cnf(c269,plain,
~ in(X103,X103),
inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c128]) ).
cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
X42 = X42,
theory(equality) ).
cnf(symmetry,axiom,
( X44 != X43
| X43 = X44 ),
theory(equality) ).
fof(t14_ordinal1,conjecture,
! [A] : A != succ(A),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_ordinal1) ).
fof(c28,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A] : A != succ(A),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t14_ordinal1]) ).
fof(c29,negated_conjecture,
? [A] : A = succ(A),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c28]) ).
fof(c30,negated_conjecture,
? [X12] : X12 = succ(X12),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c29]) ).
fof(c31,negated_conjecture,
skolem0001 = succ(skolem0001),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c30]) ).
cnf(c32,negated_conjecture,
skolem0001 = succ(skolem0001),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c31]) ).
cnf(c268,plain,
succ(skolem0001) = skolem0001,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c32,symmetry]) ).
cnf(c3,axiom,
( X58 != X60
| X59 != X57
| ~ in(X58,X59)
| in(X60,X57) ),
theory(equality) ).
fof(t10_ordinal1,axiom,
! [A] : in(A,succ(A)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_ordinal1) ).
fof(c33,plain,
! [X13] : in(X13,succ(X13)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t10_ordinal1]) ).
cnf(c34,plain,
in(X62,succ(X62)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c33]) ).
cnf(c136,plain,
( X136 != X135
| succ(X136) != X134
| in(X135,X134) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c34,c3]) ).
cnf(c435,plain,
( skolem0001 != X315
| in(X315,skolem0001) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c136,c268]) ).
cnf(c4642,plain,
in(skolem0001,skolem0001),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c435,reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c4646,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4642,c269]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM387+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed May 8 15:57:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.77/1.94 % Version: 1.5
% 1.77/1.94 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.77/1.94 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.77/1.95
% 1.77/1.95 % Initial clauses : 64
% 1.77/1.95 % Processed clauses : 448
% 1.77/1.95 % Factors computed : 5
% 1.77/1.95 % Resolvents computed: 4515
% 1.77/1.95 % Tautologies deleted: 11
% 1.77/1.95 % Forward subsumed : 421
% 1.77/1.95 % Backward subsumed : 20
% 1.77/1.95 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 1.77/1.95 % User time : 1.581 s
% 1.77/1.95 % System time : 0.019 s
% 1.77/1.95 % Total time : 1.600 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------