TSTP Solution File: NUM322+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : NUM322+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:35:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 120.60s 120.87s
% Output : Refutation 120.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : NUM322+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed May 8 16:13:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 120.60/120.87 % Version: 1.5
% 120.60/120.87 % SZS status Theorem
% 120.60/120.87 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 120.60/120.87 fof(sum_n5_nn5_what,conjecture,(?[X]:sum(n5,nn5,X)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sum_n5_nn5_what)).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(c14,negated_conjecture,(~(?[X]:sum(n5,nn5,X))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sum_n5_nn5_what])).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(c15,negated_conjecture,(![X]:~sum(n5,nn5,X)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c14])).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(c16,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:~sum(n5,nn5,X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c15])).
% 120.60/120.87 cnf(c17,negated_conjecture,~sum(n5,nn5,X138),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c16])).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(rdn5,axiom,rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax', rdn5)).
% 120.60/120.87 cnf(c511,plain,rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn5])).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(rdnn5,axiom,rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax', rdnn5)).
% 120.60/120.87 cnf(c384,plain,rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn5])).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(sum_entry_point_posx_negx,axiom,(![POS_X]:(![NEG_X]:(![RDN_X]:((rdn_translate(POS_X,rdn_pos(RDN_X))&rdn_translate(NEG_X,rdn_neg(RDN_X)))=>sum(POS_X,NEG_X,n0))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax', sum_entry_point_posx_negx)).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(c165,plain,(![POS_X]:(![NEG_X]:(![RDN_X]:((~rdn_translate(POS_X,rdn_pos(RDN_X))|~rdn_translate(NEG_X,rdn_neg(RDN_X)))|sum(POS_X,NEG_X,n0))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_posx_negx])).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(c166,plain,(![POS_X]:(![NEG_X]:((![RDN_X]:(~rdn_translate(POS_X,rdn_pos(RDN_X))|~rdn_translate(NEG_X,rdn_neg(RDN_X))))|sum(POS_X,NEG_X,n0)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c165])).
% 120.60/120.87 fof(c168,plain,(![X65]:(![X66]:(![X67]:((~rdn_translate(X65,rdn_pos(X67))|~rdn_translate(X66,rdn_neg(X67)))|sum(X65,X66,n0))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c167,plain,(![X65]:(![X66]:((![X67]:(~rdn_translate(X65,rdn_pos(X67))|~rdn_translate(X66,rdn_neg(X67))))|sum(X65,X66,n0)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c166])).])).
% 120.60/120.87 cnf(c169,plain,~rdn_translate(X422,rdn_pos(X424))|~rdn_translate(X423,rdn_neg(X424))|sum(X422,X423,n0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c168])).
% 120.60/120.87 cnf(c1798,plain,~rdn_translate(X2451,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))|sum(X2451,nn5,n0),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c169, c384])).
% 120.60/120.87 cnf(c29930,plain,sum(n5,nn5,n0),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1798, c511])).
% 120.60/120.87 cnf(c30665,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c29930, c17])).
% 120.60/120.87 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 120.60/120.87
% 120.60/120.87 % Initial clauses : 424
% 120.60/120.87 % Processed clauses : 4903
% 120.60/120.87 % Factors computed : 103
% 120.60/120.87 % Resolvents computed: 30046
% 120.60/120.87 % Tautologies deleted: 8
% 120.60/120.87 % Forward subsumed : 1591
% 120.60/120.87 % Backward subsumed : 3
% 120.60/120.87 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 120.60/120.87 % User time : 120.317 s
% 120.60/120.87 % System time : 0.143 s
% 120.60/120.87 % Total time : 120.460 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------