TSTP Solution File: NUM304+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM304+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:24:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.78s 2.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 4 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ less(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xi9fpj8c/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( less(X1,X2)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X3))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xi9fpj8c/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_153,negated_conjecture,
X1 = n12,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xi9fpj8c/input.p',i_0_153) ).
cnf(i_0_20,plain,
rdn_translate(n1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xi9fpj8c/input.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(c_0_158,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ less(X2,X1) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_159,plain,
( less(X1,X2)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X3))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X4)) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_160,negated_conjecture,
X1 = n12,
i_0_153 ).
cnf(c_0_161,plain,
rdn_translate(n1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n1))),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_162,plain,
~ less(X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_158]) ).
cnf(c_0_163,plain,
( less(X1,X2)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,n12)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,n12) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_159,c_0_160]),c_0_160]) ).
cnf(c_0_164,plain,
rdn_translate(n1,n12),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_161,c_0_160]),c_0_160]) ).
cnf(c_0_165,plain,
~ rdn_translate(X1,n12),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_162,c_0_163]) ).
cnf(c_0_166,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_164,c_0_165]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : NUM304+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 07:20:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.78/2.26 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.78/2.26 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.78/2.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 6.78/2.26
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof found!
% 6.78/2.26 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.78/2.26 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 6.78/2.26 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 6.78/2.26 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.78/2.26 # Parsed axioms : 162
% 6.78/2.26 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Initial clauses : 162
% 6.78/2.26 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Initial clauses in saturation : 162
% 6.78/2.26 # Processed clauses : 164
% 6.78/2.26 # ...of these trivial : 124
% 6.78/2.26 # ...subsumed : 5
% 6.78/2.26 # ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 6.78/2.26 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 6.78/2.26 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Generated clauses : 81
% 6.78/2.26 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 38
% 6.78/2.26 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 6.78/2.26 # Paramodulations : 66
% 6.78/2.26 # Factorizations : 2
% 6.78/2.26 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 6.78/2.26 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 6.78/2.26 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 6.78/2.26 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 6.78/2.26 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 6.78/2.26 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 6.78/2.26 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 6.78/2.26 # ...number of literals in the above : 50
% 6.78/2.26 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 6.78/2.26 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 193
% 6.78/2.26 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 75
% 6.78/2.26 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 6.78/2.26 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 49
% 6.78/2.26 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.78/2.26 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3778
% 6.78/2.26
% 6.78/2.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.78/2.26 # User time : 0.010 s
% 6.78/2.26 # System time : 0.004 s
% 6.78/2.26 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 6.78/2.26 # ...preprocessing : 0.012 s
% 6.78/2.26 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 6.78/2.26 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 6.78/2.26
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------