TSTP Solution File: NUM290+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : NUM290+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 08:18:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.43s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 18 ~; 12 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 22 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1309,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f1308,f510]) ).
fof(f510,plain,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdn2) ).
fof(f1308,plain,
~ rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
inference(resolution,[],[f1225,f509]) ).
fof(f509,plain,
rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdn3) ).
fof(f1225,plain,
( ~ rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
| ~ rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f1184,f491]) ).
fof(f491,plain,
rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f268]) ).
fof(f268,axiom,
rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rdn_positive_less23) ).
fof(f1184,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ rdn_positive_less(X0,X1)
| ~ rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(X1))
| ~ rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(X0)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f865,f475]) ).
fof(f475,plain,
~ less(n2,n3),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f404]) ).
fof(f404,plain,
~ less(n2,n3),
inference(flattening,[],[f403]) ).
fof(f403,negated_conjecture,
~ less(n2,n3),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f402]) ).
fof(f402,conjecture,
less(n2,n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n2_less_n3) ).
fof(f865,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( less(X0,X1)
| ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
| ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f444]) ).
fof(f444,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( less(X0,X1)
| ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
| ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f443]) ).
fof(f443,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( less(X0,X1)
| ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
| ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f411]) ).
fof(f411,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( rdn_positive_less(X2,X3)
& rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
& rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) )
=> less(X0,X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f281]) ).
fof(f281,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X9,X10] :
( ( rdn_positive_less(X9,X10)
& rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10))
& rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X9)) )
=> less(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_entry_point_pos_pos) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM290+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:37:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % (24082)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.13/0.38 % (24085)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.13/0.38 % (24087)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.38 % (24086)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.38 % (24085)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.38 % (24089)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.38 % (24084)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.38 % (24088)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.13/0.38 % (24083)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.41 TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.42 TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.42 % (24088)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.43 % (24088)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-24082"
% 0.19/0.43 % (24088)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.43 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.43 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.43 % (24088)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.43 % (24088)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.19/0.43 % (24088)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 % (24088)Memory used [KB]: 1992
% 0.19/0.43 % (24088)Time elapsed: 0.047 s
% 0.19/0.43 % (24088)Instructions burned: 94 (million)
% 0.19/0.43 % (24082)Success in time 0.077 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------