TSTP Solution File: NUM290+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : NUM290+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:48:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(less_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X10,X11] :
( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10))
& rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
& rdn_positive_less(X10,X11) )
=> less(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.d7qwqBXqk8/E---3.1_29887.p',less_entry_point_pos_pos) ).
fof(rdn_positive_less23,axiom,
rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.d7qwqBXqk8/E---3.1_29887.p',rdn_positive_less23) ).
fof(n2_less_n3,conjecture,
less(n2,n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.d7qwqBXqk8/E---3.1_29887.p',n2_less_n3) ).
fof(rdn3,axiom,
rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.d7qwqBXqk8/E---3.1_29887.p',rdn3) ).
fof(rdn2,axiom,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.d7qwqBXqk8/E---3.1_29887.p',rdn2) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X33,X34,X35,X36] :
( ~ rdn_translate(X33,rdn_pos(X35))
| ~ rdn_translate(X34,rdn_pos(X36))
| ~ rdn_positive_less(X35,X36)
| less(X33,X34) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_pos_pos])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( less(X1,X3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
| ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
| ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less23]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ less(n2,n3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[n2_less_n3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( less(X1,X2)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn3]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ less(n2,n3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( less(X1,n3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn2]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ less(n2,n3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11 % Problem : NUM290+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.05/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.31 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:16:19 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.d7qwqBXqk8/E---3.1_29887.p
% 0.16/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 29966 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 325s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 29969 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.16/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 325s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 402
% 0.16/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 276
% 0.16/0.46 # Initial clauses : 128
% 0.16/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 128
% 0.16/0.46 # Processed clauses : 183
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 183
% 0.16/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.16/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Generated clauses : 58
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 53
% 0.16/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Paramodulations : 55
% 0.16/0.46 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.16/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 54
% 0.16/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.16/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 126
% 0.16/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 171
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 128
% 0.16/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 75
% 0.16/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 61
% 0.16/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9100
% 0.16/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1548
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2700 pages
% 0.16/0.46
% 0.16/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.16/0.46 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.16/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2052 pages
% 0.16/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------