TSTP Solution File: NUM288-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NUM288-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:31:20 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4250/NUM/NUM288-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 102] [nf = 0] [nu = 88] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 653] [nf = 6] [nu = 503] [ut = 83]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6065] [nf = 34] [nu = 3038] [ut = 146]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54038] [nf = 638] [nu = 18567] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 421051] [nf = 4651] [nu = 100157] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3166133] [nf = 39080] [nu = 563710] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 61 secs [nr = 23088640] [nf = 282965] [nu = 3311057] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42464227] [nf = 607041] [nu = 7290134] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42465124] [nf = 607047] [nu = 7290834] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42471577] [nf = 607087] [nu = 7294014] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 42548601] [nf = 607750] [nu = 7316615] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 43375509] [nf = 625336] [nu = 7495121] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 155 secs [nr = 53760714] [nf = 779822] [nu = 9252694] [ut = 150]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 107175947
% resolvents: 105483079 factors: 1692868
% Number of unit clauses generated: 15918373
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 14.85
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4 [1] = 44 [2] = 35 [3] = 63
% [4] = 4
% Total = 150
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 15918373 [2] = 76587405 [3] = 14220847 [4] = 449322
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] divides_2 (+)75 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)60 (-)0
% [2] less_2 (+)15 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)150 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 150
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 49972740
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 107175947
% Number of unification failures: 175772191
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 317510358
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 114875194
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 24
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 13835625
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 8410069
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 35
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 10
% Number of states in UCFA table: 1288
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2496
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.52
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 282948138
% ConstructUnitClause() = 13835771
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 27.72 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 357253
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------