TSTP Solution File: NUM287-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NUM287-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:31:11 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17586/NUM/NUM287-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84] [nf = 0] [nu = 74] [ut = 38]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 448] [nf = 4] [nu = 375] [ut = 43]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2784] [nf = 26] [nu = 2156] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17553] [nf = 210] [nu = 12621] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 107665] [nf = 2262] [nu = 67124] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 715673] [nf = 15129] [nu = 379013] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 4878639] [nf = 138388] [nu = 2215706] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 31759998] [nf = 823195] [nu = 13088392] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 31760573] [nf = 823199] [nu = 13088878] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 31763367] [nf = 823233] [nu = 13091077] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 31795536] [nf = 823445] [nu = 13108614] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 32082514] [nf = 837349] [nu = 13234449] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 138 secs [nr = 35972494] [nf = 914498] [nu = 14585000] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 301 secs [nr = 76357272] [nf = 2835197] [nu = 26745317] [ut = 75]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 79502963
% resolvents: 76661730 factors: 2841233
% Number of unit clauses generated: 26879639
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 33.81
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4 [1] = 34 [2] = 5 [3] = 32
% Total = 75
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 26879639 [2] = 45459315 [3] = 6911581 [4] = 252428
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] equalish_2 (+)60 (-)0
% [1] less_2 (+)15 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)75 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 75
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 19049671
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 79502963
% Number of unification failures: 263324313
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 276930769
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 54552309
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 4002715
% Max entries in substitution set: 25
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 23247315
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 15799636
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 35
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 10
% Number of states in UCFA table: 646
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 1248
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.52
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 342827276
% ConstructUnitClause() = 23247386
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 46.23 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 265010
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------