TSTP Solution File: NUM286-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NUM286-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:30:44 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP15662/NUM/NUM286-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 34] [nf = 0] [nu = 28] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 156] [nf = 0] [nu = 120] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 606] [nf = 0] [nu = 444] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2312] [nf = 0] [nu = 1640] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8824] [nf = 0] [nu = 6106] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33932] [nf = 0] [nu = 23024] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 130936] [nf = 0] [nu = 87262] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 507908] [nf = 0] [nu = 333164] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1974456] [nf = 0] [nu = 1275426] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 7702780] [nf = 0] [nu = 4906600] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 61 secs [nr = 30093536] [nf = 0] [nu = 18908750] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 60942108] [nf = 0] [nu = 40063372] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 60942230] [nf = 0] [nu = 40063464] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 60942680] [nf = 0] [nu = 40063788] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 60944386] [nf = 0] [nu = 40064984] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 60950898] [nf = 0] [nu = 40069450] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 60976006] [nf = 0] [nu = 40086368] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 61073010] [nf = 0] [nu = 40150606] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 61449982] [nf = 0] [nu = 40396508] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 126 secs [nr = 62916530] [nf = 0] [nu = 41338770] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 137 secs [nr = 68644854] [nf = 0] [nu = 44969944] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 182 secs [nr = 91035610] [nf = 0] [nu = 58972094] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 150832783
% resolvents: 150832783 factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 98926588
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 65.59
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4 [1] = 10
% Total = 14
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 98926588 [2] = 51906195
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] equalish_2 (+)14 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)14 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 14
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 0
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 150832783
% Number of unification failures: 56816182
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 77835521
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 96
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 24
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 73250170
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 47015350
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 13
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 81
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 119
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 120000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.68
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 39
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 207648965
% ConstructUnitClause() = 73250180
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 92.10 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 502776
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------