TSTP Solution File: NUM228-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : NUM228-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:47:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 6 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(recursion_equation_functions1,axiom,
( function(X2)
| ~ member(X1,recursion_equation_functions(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zMas8aYo8Z/E---3.1_863.p',recursion_equation_functions1) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_2,negated_conjecture,
recursion_equation_functions(z) != null_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zMas8aYo8Z/E---3.1_863.p',prove_corollary_2) ).
cnf(regularity1,axiom,
( X1 = null_class
| member(regular(X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zMas8aYo8Z/E---3.1_863.p',regularity1) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_1,negated_conjecture,
~ function(z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zMas8aYo8Z/E---3.1_863.p',prove_corollary_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( function(X2)
| ~ member(X1,recursion_equation_functions(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[recursion_equation_functions1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
recursion_equation_functions(z) != null_class,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( function(X2)
| ~ member(X1,recursion_equation_functions(X2)) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( X1 = null_class
| member(regular(X1),X1) ),
regularity1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ function(z),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
recursion_equation_functions(z) != null_class,
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( recursion_equation_functions(X1) = null_class
| function(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ function(z),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.12 % Problem : NUM228-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.02/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:34:43 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zMas8aYo8Z/E---3.1_863.p
% 0.18/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 944 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 953 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.49 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 160
% 0.18/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Initial clauses : 160
% 0.18/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 19
% 0.18/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 141
% 0.18/0.49 # Processed clauses : 181
% 0.18/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 181
% 0.18/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.18/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Generated clauses : 19
% 0.18/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.18/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.18/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.18/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.18/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 35
% 0.18/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.18/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 23
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 113
% 0.18/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 254
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 159
% 0.18/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2673
% 0.18/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1319
% 0.18/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.18/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.18/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.18/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9619
% 0.18/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 289
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.18/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2192 pages
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 # User time : 0.072 s
% 0.18/0.49 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Total time : 0.085 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1832 pages
% 0.18/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------