TSTP Solution File: NUM027-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : NUM027-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:15:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.60s 0.81s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : NUM027-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 6 13:46:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Wed Jul 6 13:46:52 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24061.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.12/0.35 assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.12/0.35 paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [copy,25,flip.1] {-} equalish(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 14
% 0.12/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 25
% 0.12/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 56
% 0.12/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.12/0.40 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.12/0.40 distinct function count: 4
% 0.12/0.40 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.60/0.81 equalish(successor(predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd(add(successor(A),successor(B)),n0)),add(successor(A),successor(B))).
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.60/0.81 16 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 510.9 K.
% 0.60/0.81 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.60/0.81 sym_ent ( 304) 117 0 117 0 34.7 K
% 0.60/0.81 term ( 32) 16224 14475 1749 24 55.4 K
% 0.60/0.81 rel ( 40) 12624 10306 2318 21 91.4 K
% 0.60/0.81 term_ptr ( 16) 7823 110 7713 0 120.5 K
% 0.60/0.81 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 fpa_head ( 24) 710 8 702 0 16.5 K
% 0.60/0.81 fpa_tree ( 56) 1327 1327 0 19 1.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 context (1288) 3994 3994 0 5 6.3 K
% 0.60/0.81 trail ( 24) 10617 10617 0 9 0.2 K
% 0.60/0.81 imd_tree ( 32) 111 8 103 0 3.2 K
% 0.60/0.81 imd_pos (4024) 1191 1191 0 4 15.7 K
% 0.60/0.81 is_tree ( 24) 1012 15 997 0 23.4 K
% 0.60/0.81 is_pos (2424) 23486 23486 0 7 16.6 K
% 0.60/0.81 fsub_pos ( 16) 3053 3053 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 literal ( 32) 3496 2701 795 2 24.9 K
% 0.60/0.81 clause ( 88) 1037 749 288 1 24.8 K
% 0.60/0.81 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.60/0.81 clash_nd ( 80) 93 93 0 1 0.1 K
% 0.60/0.81 clause_ptr ( 16) 310 40 270 2 4.2 K
% 0.60/0.81 int_ptr ( 16) 3333 2330 1003 8 15.8 K
% 0.60/0.81 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.60/0.81 me 0.00
% 0.60/0.81 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.60/0.81 unindex time 0.00
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 true clauses given 2 (7.7%)
% 0.60/0.81 false clauses given 24
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 FALSE TRUE
% 0.60/0.81 11 0 1
% 0.60/0.81 12 6 5
% 0.60/0.81 13 12 3
% 0.60/0.81 14 16 2
% 0.60/0.81 15 14 3
% 0.60/0.81 16 29 2
% 0.60/0.81 17 34 2
% 0.60/0.81 18 14 2
% 0.60/0.81 19 7 1
% 0.60/0.81 20 9 2
% 0.60/0.81 21 14 0
% 0.60/0.81 22 8 0
% 0.60/0.81 23 12 0
% 0.60/0.81 24 4 0
% 0.60/0.81 25 4 0
% 0.60/0.81 26 2 0
% 0.60/0.81 tot: 185 23 (11.1% true)
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.60/0.81 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:1
% 0.60/0.81 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.60/0.81 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:173 26:4 27:0 28:98 29:1 30:0
% 0.60/0.81 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:1 37:4 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.60/0.81 41:0 42:1 43:0 44:0 45:5 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.60/0.81 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:4 55:0 56:0 57:1 58:0 59:6 60:0
% 0.60/0.81 61:1 62:1 63:0 64:0 65:8 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:1
% 0.60/0.81 71:0 72:10 73:0 74:1 75:0 76:0 77:10 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.60/0.81 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:2 89:0 90:0
% 0.60/0.81 91:1 92:1 93:0 94:0 95:1 96:1 97:1 98:0 99:0
% 0.60/0.81 All others: 31.
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.60/0.81
% 0.60/0.81 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------