TSTP Solution File: NUM021-1 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10
% Problem  : NUM021-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  7 10:43:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 12.57s 3.19s
% Output   : Refutation 12.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  15 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (   7 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  298 (  47   ~;  38   |;   0   &; 213   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (  11   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0   ^  61   !;   0   ?;  61   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(divides_type,type,
    divides: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_type,type,
    c: $i ).

thf(a_type,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(equalish_type,type,
    equalish: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(successor_type,type,
    successor: $i > $i ).

thf(less_type,type,
    less: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(b_type,type,
    b: $i ).

thf(add_type,type,
    add: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd_type,type,
    predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ ( predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd @ B @ A ) ) @ A ) @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_lemma) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ ( predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd @ B @ A ) ) @ A ) @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ ( predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd @ B @ A ) ) @ A ) @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[45]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    divides @ c @ a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',impossible_c_divides_a) ).

thf(20,plain,
    divides @ c @ a,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( divides @ A @ B )
      | ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',divides_only_less_or_equal) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( divides @ A @ B )
      | ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( divides @ A @ B )
      | ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[33]) ).

thf(189,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( ( divides @ c @ a )
       != ( divides @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[20,34]) ).

thf(190,plain,
    ( ( less @ c @ a )
    | ( equalish @ c @ a ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[189:[bind(A,$thf( c )),bind(B,$thf( a ))]]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    less @ b @ c,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_less_than_c) ).

thf(29,plain,
    less @ b @ c,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( less @ C @ A )
      | ( less @ C @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_less) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( less @ C @ A )
      | ( less @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( less @ C @ A )
      | ( less @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[23]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ~ ( less @ b @ a ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_greater_equal_a) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ~ ( less @ b @ a ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ~ ( less @ b @ a ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( less @ C @ A )
      | ( ( less @ C @ B )
       != ( less @ b @ a ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[24,28]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ a )
      | ~ ( less @ b @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[58:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( a )),bind(C,$thf( b ))]]) ).

thf(93,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ a )
      | ( ( less @ b @ c )
       != ( less @ b @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[29,59]) ).

thf(94,plain,
    ~ ( less @ c @ a ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[93:[bind(A,$thf( c ))]]) ).

thf(256,plain,
    ( $false
    | ( equalish @ c @ a ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[190,94]) ).

thf(257,plain,
    equalish @ c @ a,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[256]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( equalish @ B @ C )
      | ( equalish @ A @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( equalish @ B @ C )
      | ( equalish @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( equalish @ B @ C )
      | ( equalish @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[36]) ).

thf(316,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ B )
      | ( equalish @ A @ C )
      | ( ( equalish @ c @ a )
       != ( equalish @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[257,37]) ).

thf(317,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ c )
      | ( equalish @ A @ a ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[316:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( c )),bind(C,$thf( a ))]]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ A ) @ B ) @ C )
      | ( less @ B @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',smaller_number) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ A ) @ B ) @ C )
      | ( less @ B @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ A ) @ B ) @ C )
      | ( less @ B @ C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[31]) ).

thf(116,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ A ) @ B ) @ C )
      | ( ( less @ B @ C )
       != ( less @ b @ a ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[32,28]) ).

thf(117,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ A ) @ b ) @ a ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[116:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( b )),bind(C,$thf( a ))]]) ).

thf(477,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( equalish @ A @ c )
      | ( ( equalish @ A @ a )
       != ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ B ) @ b ) @ a ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[317,117]) ).

thf(478,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ A ) @ b ) @ c ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[477:[bind(A,$thf( add @ ( successor @ E ) @ b )),bind(B,$thf( E ))]]) ).

thf(509,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ A ) @ b ) @ c ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[478]) ).

thf(1176,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( less @ A @ B )
      | ( ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ ( predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd @ B @ A ) ) @ A ) @ B )
       != ( equalish @ ( add @ ( successor @ C ) @ b ) @ c ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[46,509]) ).

thf(1177,plain,
    ~ ( less @ b @ c ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[1176:[bind(A,$thf( b )),bind(B,$thf( c )),bind(C,$thf( predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd @ c @ b ))]]) ).

thf(1236,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[1177,29]) ).

thf(1237,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[1236]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM021-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.15/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Mon May  6 19:35:09 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.98/0.90  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.40/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (135ms). 
% 1.40/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.85/1.25  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.85/1.25  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.85/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 17 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.02/1.34  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 17 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.02/1.35  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.02/1.35  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.02/1.36  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 12.57/3.18  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 12.57/3.18  % Time passed: 2653ms (effective reasoning time: 2135ms)
% 12.57/3.18  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 12.57/3.19  % Axioms used in derivation (7): b_greater_equal_a, less_lemma, divides_only_less_or_equal, transitivity_of_less, transitivity, smaller_number, b_less_than_c
% 12.57/3.19  % No. of inferences in proof: 41
% 12.57/3.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2653 ms resp. 2135 ms w/o parsing
% 12.57/3.21  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 12.57/3.21  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------