TSTP Solution File: NUM020-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:47:30 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.36s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(symmetry,axiom,
    ( equalish(X2,X1)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aQxbky7EsQ/E---3.1_31063.p',symmetry) ).

cnf(successor_substitution,axiom,
    ( equalish(successor(X1),successor(X2))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aQxbky7EsQ/E---3.1_31063.p',successor_substitution) ).

cnf(adding_zero,axiom,
    equalish(add(X1,n0),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aQxbky7EsQ/E---3.1_31063.p',adding_zero) ).

cnf(transitivity,axiom,
    ( equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aQxbky7EsQ/E---3.1_31063.p',transitivity) ).

cnf(deny_addition_lemma,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(a,successor(n0)),successor(a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aQxbky7EsQ/E---3.1_31063.p',deny_addition_lemma) ).

cnf(addition,axiom,
    equalish(add(X1,successor(X2)),successor(add(X1,X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aQxbky7EsQ/E---3.1_31063.p',addition) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( equalish(X2,X1)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symmetry]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( equalish(successor(X1),successor(X2))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[successor_substitution]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( equalish(X2,X1)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( equalish(successor(X1),successor(X2))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    equalish(add(X1,n0),X1),
    adding_zero ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( equalish(successor(X1),successor(X2))
    | ~ equalish(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    equalish(X1,add(X1,n0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X2,X3) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    equalish(successor(add(X1,n0)),successor(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(a,successor(n0)),successor(a)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[deny_addition_lemma]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,successor(X2))
    | ~ equalish(X1,successor(add(X2,n0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    equalish(add(X1,successor(X2)),successor(add(X1,X2))),
    addition ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(a,successor(n0)),successor(a)),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    equalish(add(X1,successor(n0)),successor(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 09:28:02 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aQxbky7EsQ/E---3.1_31063.p
% 0.36/0.54  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.36/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # new_bool_1 with pid 31209 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.36/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.54  # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 31215 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.36/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.54  # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.36/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.36/0.54  
% 0.36/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.36/0.54  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.36/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.36/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.36/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.36/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.36/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 78
% 0.36/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.36/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 16
% 0.36/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.36/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.36/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 347
% 0.36/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 283
% 0.36/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 347
% 0.36/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 56
% 0.36/0.54  # ...of those cached                   : 36
% 0.36/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.36/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.36/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.36/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.36/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.36/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.36/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.36/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.36/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.36/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.36/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 46
% 0.36/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 22
% 0.36/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.36/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 23
% 0.36/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 223
% 0.36/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 422
% 0.36/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.36/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 158
% 0.36/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 158
% 0.36/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 16
% 0.36/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.36/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 27
% 0.36/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.36/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.36/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4565
% 0.36/0.54  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 24
% 0.36/0.54  
% 0.36/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.54  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.36/0.54  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.36/0.54  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.36/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1604 pages
% 0.36/0.54  
% 0.36/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.54  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.36/0.54  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.36/0.54  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.36/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.36/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.36/0.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------