TSTP Solution File: NLP175+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : NLP175+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:50:31 EDT 2023
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 6.82s 2.48s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : NLP175+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 13:20:19 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 6.82/2.48
% 6.82/2.48 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.82/2.48
% 6.82/2.48 Inference rules
% 6.82/2.48 ----------------------
% 6.82/2.48 #Ref : 0
% 6.82/2.48 #Sup : 208
% 6.82/2.48 #Fact : 0
% 6.82/2.48 #Define : 0
% 6.82/2.48 #Split : 4
% 6.82/2.48 #Chain : 0
% 6.82/2.48 #Close : 0
% 6.82/2.48
% 6.82/2.48 Ordering : KBO
% 6.82/2.48
% 6.82/2.48 Simplification rules
% 6.82/2.48 ----------------------
% 6.82/2.48 #Subsume : 24
% 6.82/2.48 #Demod : 27
% 6.82/2.48 #Tautology : 24
% 6.82/2.48 #SimpNegUnit : 6
% 6.82/2.48 #BackRed : 0
% 6.82/2.48
% 6.82/2.48 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.82/2.48 #Strategies tried : 1
% 6.82/2.48
% 6.82/2.48 Timing (in seconds)
% 6.82/2.48 ----------------------
% 6.82/2.49 Preprocessing : 0.67
% 6.82/2.49 Parsing : 0.34
% 6.82/2.49 CNF conversion : 0.06
% 6.82/2.49 Main loop : 0.80
% 6.82/2.49 Inferencing : 0.30
% 6.82/2.49 Reduction : 0.23
% 6.82/2.49 Demodulation : 0.14
% 6.82/2.49 BG Simplification : 0.05
% 6.82/2.49 Subsumption : 0.15
% 6.82/2.49 Abstraction : 0.03
% 6.82/2.49 MUC search : 0.00
% 6.82/2.49 Cooper : 0.00
% 6.82/2.49 Total : 1.49
% 6.82/2.49 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 6.82/2.49 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 6.82/2.49 Index Matching : 0.00
% 6.82/2.49 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------