TSTP Solution File: NLP148+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : NLP148+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:50:26 EDT 2023
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 6.32s 2.49s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : NLP148+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 13:03:07 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 6.32/2.49
% 6.32/2.49 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.32/2.49
% 6.32/2.49 Inference rules
% 6.32/2.49 ----------------------
% 6.32/2.49 #Ref : 0
% 6.32/2.49 #Sup : 148
% 6.32/2.49 #Fact : 0
% 6.32/2.49 #Define : 0
% 6.32/2.49 #Split : 3
% 6.32/2.49 #Chain : 0
% 6.32/2.49 #Close : 0
% 6.32/2.49
% 6.32/2.49 Ordering : KBO
% 6.32/2.49
% 6.32/2.49 Simplification rules
% 6.32/2.50 ----------------------
% 6.32/2.50 #Subsume : 15
% 6.32/2.50 #Demod : 14
% 6.32/2.50 #Tautology : 9
% 6.32/2.50 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 6.32/2.50 #BackRed : 0
% 6.32/2.50
% 6.32/2.50 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.32/2.50 #Strategies tried : 1
% 6.32/2.50
% 6.32/2.50 Timing (in seconds)
% 6.32/2.50 ----------------------
% 6.32/2.50 Preprocessing : 0.69
% 6.32/2.50 Parsing : 0.34
% 6.32/2.50 CNF conversion : 0.07
% 6.32/2.50 Main loop : 0.73
% 6.32/2.50 Inferencing : 0.30
% 6.32/2.50 Reduction : 0.20
% 6.32/2.50 Demodulation : 0.12
% 6.32/2.50 BG Simplification : 0.05
% 6.32/2.50 Subsumption : 0.12
% 6.32/2.50 Abstraction : 0.02
% 6.32/2.50 MUC search : 0.00
% 6.32/2.50 Cooper : 0.00
% 6.32/2.50 Total : 1.43
% 6.32/2.50 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 6.32/2.50 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 6.32/2.50 Index Matching : 0.00
% 6.32/2.50 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------