TSTP Solution File: NLP145+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : NLP145+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:04:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 9.91s 2.07s
% Output : Proof 14.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NLP145+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 11:15:47 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 ________ _____
% 0.20/0.58 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.58 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.20/0.58 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.20/0.58 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.58 (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.58 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.58 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.58 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.59 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.61 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.61 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.61 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.61 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.61 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.61 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.61 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.97/1.14 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.14 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.17 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.17 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.17 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.17 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.97/1.17 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 5.03/1.60 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.42/1.62 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 8.30/1.84 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 8.94/1.94 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.94/1.94 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.08/1.99 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.91/2.07 Prover 5: proved (1462ms)
% 9.91/2.07
% 9.91/2.07 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.91/2.07
% 9.91/2.08 Prover 2: stopped
% 9.91/2.08 Prover 3: stopped
% 9.91/2.09 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 9.91/2.09 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 9.91/2.09 Prover 6: stopped
% 9.91/2.10 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 9.91/2.10 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 9.91/2.10 Prover 0: stopped
% 9.91/2.10 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 9.91/2.10 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 9.91/2.19 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 9.91/2.22 Prover 1: gave up
% 9.91/2.23 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 9.91/2.23 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 9.91/2.25 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 9.91/2.26 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 11.16/2.27 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 11.60/2.31 Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 11.60/2.35 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.05/2.36 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.05/2.38 Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.05/2.41 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.46/2.59 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.46/2.60 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.93/2.62 Prover 13: Found proof (size 24)
% 13.93/2.62 Prover 13: proved (517ms)
% 13.93/2.62 Prover 11: stopped
% 13.93/2.62 Prover 10: stopped
% 13.93/2.62 Prover 4: stopped
% 13.93/2.62 Prover 7: stopped
% 13.93/2.62 Prover 16: stopped
% 13.93/2.62 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.93/2.63 Prover 8: stopped
% 13.93/2.63
% 13.93/2.63 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 13.93/2.63
% 13.93/2.63 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 13.93/2.64 Assumptions after simplification:
% 13.93/2.64 ---------------------------------
% 13.93/2.64
% 13.93/2.64 (ax1)
% 13.93/2.64 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ furniture(v0, v1) |
% 13.93/2.64 instrumentality(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.64
% 13.93/2.64 (ax18)
% 13.93/2.64 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ object(v0, v1) |
% 13.93/2.64 nonliving(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.64
% 13.93/2.64 (ax2)
% 13.93/2.64 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ seat(v0, v1) |
% 13.93/2.64 furniture(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.64
% 13.93/2.64 (ax20)
% 13.93/2.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ artifact(v0, v1) |
% 13.93/2.65 object(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.65
% 13.93/2.65 (ax21)
% 13.93/2.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ instrumentality(v0,
% 13.93/2.65 v1) | artifact(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.65
% 13.93/2.65 (ax3)
% 13.93/2.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ frontseat(v0, v1) |
% 13.93/2.65 seat(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.65
% 13.93/2.65 (ax38)
% 13.93/2.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ human_person(v0, v1) |
% 13.93/2.65 animate(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.65
% 13.93/2.65 (ax48)
% 13.93/2.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ man(v0, v1) |
% 13.93/2.65 human_person(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.65
% 13.93/2.65 (ax49)
% 13.93/2.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ fellow(v0, v1) |
% 13.93/2.65 man(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.65
% 13.93/2.65 (ax50)
% 13.93/2.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ animate(v0, v1) | ~
% 13.93/2.65 nonliving(v0, v1))
% 13.93/2.65
% 13.93/2.65 (ax59)
% 13.93/2.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v2 | ~ $i(v3) |
% 13.93/2.65 ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ be(v0, v1, v2, v3))
% 13.93/2.65
% 13.93/2.65 (ax60)
% 13.93/2.66 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v2 | ~ $i(v3) |
% 13.93/2.66 ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(v0, v3, v1) | ~ member(v0,
% 13.93/2.66 v2, v1) | two(v0, v1) | ? [v4: $i] : ( ~ (v4 = v3) & ~ (v4 = v2) &
% 13.93/2.66 $i(v4) & member(v0, v4, v1))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |
% 13.93/2.66 ~ $i(v0) | ~ two(v0, v1) | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) &
% 13.93/2.66 $i(v3) & $i(v2) & member(v0, v3, v1) & member(v0, v2, v1) & ! [v4: $i] :
% 13.93/2.66 (v4 = v3 | v4 = v2 | ~ $i(v4) | ~ member(v0, v4, v1))))
% 13.93/2.66
% 13.93/2.66 (co1)
% 14.27/2.66 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5:
% 14.27/2.66 $i] : ? [v6: $i] : ($i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) &
% 14.27/2.66 $i(v0) & in(v0, v5, v1) & down(v0, v5, v4) & present(v0, v5) & agent(v0, v5,
% 14.27/2.66 v3) & lonely(v0, v4) & dirty(v0, v3) & white(v0, v3) & actual_world(v0) &
% 14.27/2.66 of(v0, v2, v1) & old(v0, v3) & group(v0, v6) & two(v0, v6) & event(v0, v5) &
% 14.27/2.66 barrel(v0, v5) & chevy(v0, v3) & street(v0, v4) & placename(v0, v2) &
% 14.27/2.66 hollywood_placename(v0, v2) & city(v0, v1) & ! [v7: $i] : ( ~ $i(v7) | ~
% 14.27/2.66 member(v0, v7, v6) | young(v0, v7)) & ! [v7: $i] : ( ~ $i(v7) | ~
% 14.27/2.66 member(v0, v7, v6) | fellow(v0, v7)) & ! [v7: $i] : ( ~ $i(v7) | ~
% 14.27/2.66 member(v0, v7, v6) | ? [v8: $i] : ? [v9: $i] : ($i(v9) & $i(v8) & in(v0,
% 14.27/2.66 v9, v9) & be(v0, v8, v7, v9) & state(v0, v8) & frontseat(v0, v9))))
% 14.27/2.66
% 14.27/2.66 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 14.27/2.66 --------------------------------------------
% 14.27/2.66 ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax19, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25,
% 14.27/2.66 ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax30, ax31, ax32, ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax39,
% 14.27/2.66 ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44, ax45, ax46, ax47, ax5, ax51, ax52, ax53,
% 14.27/2.66 ax54, ax55, ax56, ax57, ax58, ax6, ax61, ax7, ax8, ax9
% 14.27/2.66
% 14.27/2.66 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 14.27/2.66 ---------------------------------
% 14.27/2.66
% 14.27/2.66 Begin of proof
% 14.27/2.66 |
% 14.27/2.66 | ALPHA: (ax60) implies:
% 14.27/2.66 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ two(v0, v1) |
% 14.27/2.66 | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 14.27/2.66 | member(v0, v3, v1) & member(v0, v2, v1) & ! [v4: $i] : (v4 = v3 |
% 14.27/2.66 | v4 = v2 | ~ $i(v4) | ~ member(v0, v4, v1))))
% 14.27/2.66 |
% 14.27/2.66 | DELTA: instantiating (co1) with fresh symbols all_63_0, all_63_1, all_63_2,
% 14.27/2.66 | all_63_3, all_63_4, all_63_5, all_63_6 gives:
% 14.27/2.67 | (2) $i(all_63_0) & $i(all_63_1) & $i(all_63_2) & $i(all_63_3) &
% 14.27/2.67 | $i(all_63_4) & $i(all_63_5) & $i(all_63_6) & in(all_63_6, all_63_1,
% 14.27/2.67 | all_63_5) & down(all_63_6, all_63_1, all_63_2) & present(all_63_6,
% 14.27/2.67 | all_63_1) & agent(all_63_6, all_63_1, all_63_3) & lonely(all_63_6,
% 14.27/2.67 | all_63_2) & dirty(all_63_6, all_63_3) & white(all_63_6, all_63_3) &
% 14.27/2.67 | actual_world(all_63_6) & of(all_63_6, all_63_4, all_63_5) &
% 14.27/2.67 | old(all_63_6, all_63_3) & group(all_63_6, all_63_0) & two(all_63_6,
% 14.27/2.67 | all_63_0) & event(all_63_6, all_63_1) & barrel(all_63_6, all_63_1) &
% 14.27/2.67 | chevy(all_63_6, all_63_3) & street(all_63_6, all_63_2) &
% 14.27/2.67 | placename(all_63_6, all_63_4) & hollywood_placename(all_63_6, all_63_4)
% 14.27/2.67 | & city(all_63_6, all_63_5) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~
% 14.27/2.67 | member(all_63_6, v0, all_63_0) | young(all_63_6, v0)) & ! [v0: $i] :
% 14.27/2.67 | ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(all_63_6, v0, all_63_0) | fellow(all_63_6, v0))
% 14.27/2.67 | & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(all_63_6, v0, all_63_0) | ?
% 14.27/2.67 | [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & $i(v1) & in(all_63_6, v2, v2) &
% 14.27/2.67 | be(all_63_6, v1, v0, v2) & state(all_63_6, v1) &
% 14.27/2.67 | frontseat(all_63_6, v2)))
% 14.27/2.67 |
% 14.27/2.67 | ALPHA: (2) implies:
% 14.27/2.67 | (3) two(all_63_6, all_63_0)
% 14.27/2.67 | (4) $i(all_63_6)
% 14.27/2.67 | (5) $i(all_63_0)
% 14.27/2.67 | (6) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(all_63_6, v0, all_63_0) | ? [v1:
% 14.27/2.67 | $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & $i(v1) & in(all_63_6, v2, v2) &
% 14.27/2.67 | be(all_63_6, v1, v0, v2) & state(all_63_6, v1) &
% 14.27/2.67 | frontseat(all_63_6, v2)))
% 14.27/2.67 | (7) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(all_63_6, v0, all_63_0) |
% 14.27/2.67 | fellow(all_63_6, v0))
% 14.27/2.67 |
% 14.27/2.67 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_63_6, all_63_0, simplifying with (3),
% 14.27/2.67 | (4), (5) gives:
% 14.27/2.67 | (8) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) &
% 14.27/2.67 | member(all_63_6, v1, all_63_0) & member(all_63_6, v0, all_63_0) & !
% 14.27/2.67 | [v2: $i] : (v2 = v1 | v2 = v0 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ member(all_63_6, v2,
% 14.27/2.67 | all_63_0)))
% 14.27/2.67 |
% 14.27/2.67 | DELTA: instantiating (8) with fresh symbols all_72_0, all_72_1 gives:
% 14.27/2.67 | (9) ~ (all_72_0 = all_72_1) & $i(all_72_0) & $i(all_72_1) &
% 14.27/2.67 | member(all_63_6, all_72_0, all_63_0) & member(all_63_6, all_72_1,
% 14.27/2.67 | all_63_0) & ! [v0: any] : (v0 = all_72_0 | v0 = all_72_1 | ~ $i(v0)
% 14.27/2.67 | | ~ member(all_63_6, v0, all_63_0))
% 14.27/2.67 |
% 14.27/2.67 | ALPHA: (9) implies:
% 14.27/2.67 | (10) member(all_63_6, all_72_0, all_63_0)
% 14.27/2.67 | (11) $i(all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.67 |
% 14.27/2.67 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_72_0, simplifying with (10), (11)
% 14.27/2.67 | gives:
% 14.27/2.67 | (12) fellow(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.67 |
% 14.27/2.67 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_72_0, simplifying with (10), (11)
% 14.27/2.67 | gives:
% 14.27/2.67 | (13) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ($i(v1) & $i(v0) & in(all_63_6, v1, v1) &
% 14.27/2.67 | be(all_63_6, v0, all_72_0, v1) & state(all_63_6, v0) &
% 14.27/2.67 | frontseat(all_63_6, v1))
% 14.27/2.67 |
% 14.27/2.67 | DELTA: instantiating (13) with fresh symbols all_81_0, all_81_1 gives:
% 14.27/2.67 | (14) $i(all_81_0) & $i(all_81_1) & in(all_63_6, all_81_0, all_81_0) &
% 14.27/2.67 | be(all_63_6, all_81_1, all_72_0, all_81_0) & state(all_63_6, all_81_1)
% 14.27/2.68 | & frontseat(all_63_6, all_81_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | ALPHA: (14) implies:
% 14.27/2.68 | (15) frontseat(all_63_6, all_81_0)
% 14.27/2.68 | (16) be(all_63_6, all_81_1, all_72_0, all_81_0)
% 14.27/2.68 | (17) $i(all_81_1)
% 14.27/2.68 | (18) $i(all_81_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax3) with all_63_6, all_81_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (15), (18) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (19) seat(all_63_6, all_81_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax49) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (12) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (20) man(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax59) with all_63_6, all_81_1, all_72_0, all_81_0,
% 14.27/2.68 | simplifying with (4), (11), (16), (17), (18) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (21) all_81_0 = all_72_0
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | REDUCE: (19), (21) imply:
% 14.27/2.68 | (22) seat(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax2) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (22) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (23) furniture(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax48) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (20) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (24) human_person(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax1) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (23) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (25) instrumentality(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax38) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (24) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (26) animate(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax21) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (25) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (27) artifact(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax20) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (27) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (28) object(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax18) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (28) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (29) nonliving(all_63_6, all_72_0)
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax50) with all_63_6, all_72_0, simplifying with
% 14.27/2.68 | (4), (11), (26), (29) gives:
% 14.27/2.68 | (30) $false
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 | CLOSE: (30) is inconsistent.
% 14.27/2.68 |
% 14.27/2.68 End of proof
% 14.27/2.68 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 14.27/2.68
% 14.27/2.68 2100ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------