TSTP Solution File: MSC015-1.005 by SETHEO---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SETHEO---3.3
% Problem  : MSC015-1.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : setheo
% Command  : setheo-wrapper %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Dec 24 17:32:13 EST 2010

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.00s
% Output   : Assurance 0.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC MSC015-1.005+noeq /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq
% MUST DELETE /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq.hex
% MUST DELETE /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq.log
% MUST DELETE /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq.tree
% codegen: 67 [199999] labels, 0 colls [170 accesses]
% Assembler optimization: 26 labels read, 14 labels output
%   /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq.hex generated in  0.00 seconds
% inwasm V4.02b [wasm-less] Copyright TU Munich 1998 (03/30/98)
%   Command line: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/SETHEO---3.3/setheo.linux/inwasm -cons -foldup /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq 
%   Parsing input-file.
%   Preprocessing: Generating weak-unification.
%   Preprocessing: purity
%         Message: Deleted clauses : None.
%         Message: Making sortarray.
%   Preprocessing: orbranch reordering 
%   Preprocessing: inserting tautology-constraints 
%   Preprocessing: inserting subsumption-constraints
%   Preprocessing: removing redundant constraints
%         Message: 0 constraints deleted.
%   Preprocessing: inserting reduction steps
%   Preprocessing: subgoal reordering
%   Codegeneration.
% SAM V4.0[LINUX,PIL] Copyright TU Munich (June 1999)
%   32 bit word format
%   main.c built on Feb 12 2004 at 21:51:21
%   run Fri Dec 24 17:32:14 2010
% Options : -dr -cons -dynsgreord 2 /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq 
% using antilemma-constraints
% using regularity-constraints
% using tautology-constraints
% using subsumption-constraints
% Loading code...
% Initializing memory...
% Initializing registers1...
% Initializing registers2...
% Initializing bounds...
% Initializing signals...
% Start proving...
% -d:    2  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =        3  fails =        2
% -d:    3  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =        7  fails =        5
% -d:    4  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =        9  fails =        6
% -d:    5  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       13  fails =        9
% -d:    6  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       15  fails =       10
% -d:    7  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       19  fails =       13
% -d:    8  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       21  fails =       14
% -d:    9  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       25  fails =       17
% -d:   10  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       27  fails =       18
% -d:   11  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       31  fails =       21
% -d:   12  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       33  fails =       22
% -d:   13  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       37  fails =       25
% -d:   14  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       39  fails =       26
% -d:   15  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       43  fails =       29
% -d:   16  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       45  fails =       30
% -d:   17  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       49  fails =       33
% -d:   18  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       51  fails =       34
% -d:   19  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       55  fails =       37
% -d:   20  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       57  fails =       38
% -d:   21  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       61  fails =       41
% -d:   22  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       63  fails =       42
% -d:   23  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       67  fails =       45
% -d:   24  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       69  fails =       46
% -d:   25  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       73  fails =       49
% -d:   26  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       75  fails =       50
% -d:   27  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       79  fails =       53
% -d:   28  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       81  fails =       54
% -d:   29  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       85  fails =       57
% -d:   30  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       87  fails =       58
% -d:   31  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       91  fails =       61
% -d:   32  time     < 0.01 sec  inferences =       59  fails =       26
%                     ******** SUCCESS ************
% Number of inferences in proof    :       32
%         - E/R/F/L                :       32/       0/       0/       0
% Intermediate free variables      :        0
% Intermediate inferences          :       32
% Intermediate open subgoals       :        1
% Generated antilemmata            :        0
% Number of unifications           :     1469
%     - E/R/F/L                    :     1469/       0/       0/       0
% Number of fails                  :      971
%     - unification                :      941
%     - depth bound                :       30
% Number of folding operations     :       32
%     - one level                  :        1
%     - root                       :       32
% Instructions executed            :     8563
% Abstract machine time (seconds)  :   < 0.01
% Overall time          (seconds)  :   < 0.01
% Cleaning up before exit
% Delete /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq.hex /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq.log /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23599/MSC/MSC015-1.005+noeq.tree
% That's all folks
% Killed 1 orphans
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------