TSTP Solution File: MSC012+1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : MSC012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:57:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    ~ goal,
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal_to_be_proved)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ( p(sG)
    | p(sK0(sG)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_to_left)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( ~ p(sG)
    | ~ p(sK1(sG))
    | ~ less(sG,sK1(sG))
    | goal ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_to_right)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    less(sG,sK1(sG)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',serial_less)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( p(sK1(sG))
    | p(sK0(sK1(sG))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_to_left)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK0(sG))
    | ~ p(sK1(sK0(sG)))
    | ~ less(sK0(sG),sK1(sK0(sG)))
    | goal ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_to_right)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    less(sK0(sG),sK1(sK0(sG))),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',serial_less)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ( p(sK1(sK0(sG)))
    | p(sK0(sK1(sK0(sG)))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_to_left)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    ( p(sK1(sK0(sG)))
    | less(sK1(sK0(sG)),sK0(sK1(sK0(sG)))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_to_left)]) ).

cnf(g9,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK0(sG))
    | ~ p(sK0(sK1(sK0(sG))))
    | ~ less(sK0(sG),sK0(sK1(sK0(sG))))
    | goal ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_to_right)]) ).

cnf(g10,plain,
    ( ~ less(sK0(sG),sK1(sK0(sG)))
    | ~ less(sK1(sK0(sG)),sK0(sK1(sK0(sG))))
    | less(sK0(sG),sK0(sK1(sK0(sG)))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitive_less)]) ).

cnf(g11,plain,
    ( ~ p(sG)
    | ~ p(sK0(sK1(sG)))
    | ~ less(sG,sK0(sK1(sG)))
    | goal ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_to_right)]) ).

cnf(g12,plain,
    ( ~ less(sG,sK1(sG))
    | ~ less(sK1(sG),sK0(sK1(sG)))
    | less(sG,sK0(sK1(sG))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitive_less)]) ).

cnf(g13,plain,
    ( p(sK1(sG))
    | less(sK1(sG),sK0(sK1(sG))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_to_left)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : MSC012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 16:56:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % symbols: 7
% 0.13/0.35  % clauses: 6
% 0.13/0.35  % start clauses: 1
% 0.13/0.35  % iterative deepening steps: 73
% 0.13/0.35  % maximum path limit: 4
% 0.13/0.35  % literal attempts: 604
% 0.13/0.35  % depth failures: 245
% 0.13/0.35  % regularity failures: 24
% 0.13/0.35  % tautology failures: 5
% 0.13/0.35  % reductions: 25
% 0.13/0.35  % extensions: 523
% 0.13/0.35  % SAT variables: 230
% 0.13/0.35  % SAT clauses: 309
% 0.13/0.35  % WalkSAT solutions: 301
% 0.13/0.35  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------