TSTP Solution File: MSC011+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 18 05:34:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.38s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Sep 2 03:12:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.34 Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.34 -h, -? prints this message.
% 0.12/0.34 -smt2 print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34 -m, -model generate model.
% 0.12/0.34 -p, -proof generate proof.
% 0.12/0.34 -c, -core generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.34 -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.34 -t:timeout set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.34 -smt2status display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.34 -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34 -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.34 -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.19/0.38 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.38 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.38 tff(drunk_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.38 drunk: $i > $o)).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(tptp_fun_A_0_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.38 tptp_fun_A_0: $i)).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(neg_psi_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.38 neg_psi: $o)).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(not_drunk_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.38 not_drunk: $i > $o)).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(elem_1_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.38 elem_1: $i)).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(goal_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.38 goal: $o)).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(1,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (^[A: $i] : refl((~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A)))) <=> (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A)))))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(2,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (![A: $i] : (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A)))) <=> ![A: $i] : (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A))))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(3,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (^[A: $i] : rewrite((drunk(A) & neg_psi) <=> (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A)))))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(4,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (![A: $i] : (drunk(A) & neg_psi) <=> ![A: $i] : (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A))))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(5,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (![A: $i] : (drunk(A) & neg_psi) <=> ![A: $i] : (drunk(A) & neg_psi)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(6,axiom,(![A: $i] : (drunk(A) & neg_psi)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','neg_phi')).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(7,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (![A: $i] : (drunk(A) & neg_psi)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 5])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(8,plain,(
% 0.19/0.38 ![A: $i] : (drunk(A) & neg_psi)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[7])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(9,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (![A: $i] : (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A))))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 4])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(10,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (![A: $i] : (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A))))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 2])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(11,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~![A: $i] : (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(A))))) | (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(elem!1))))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (~((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(elem!1)))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[11, 10])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(13,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (((~neg_psi) | (~drunk(elem!1))) | neg_psi),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(14,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (neg_psi),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[13, 12])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(15,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 (((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)) <=> ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(16,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((neg_psi => ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)) <=> ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A))),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(17,axiom,(neg_psi => ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','neg_psi_ax')).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(18,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[17, 16])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(19,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[18, 15])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(20,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19, 15])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[20, 15])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[21, 15])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(23,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[22, 15])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(24,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[23, 15])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(25,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[24, 15])).
% 0.19/0.38 tff(26,plain,
% 0.19/0.38 ((~neg_psi) | ?[A: $i] : not_drunk(A)),
% 0.19/0.38 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[25, 15])).
% 0.19/0.38 Proof display could not be completed: monotonicity rule is not handled
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------