TSTP Solution File: MSC011+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:56:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 0.98s
% Output   : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 15:47:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.98  Process 19999 was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.98  Fri Jul  1 15:47:33 2022
% 0.44/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_19846_n012.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_19846_n012.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.98  1 (all A (drunk(A) & not_drunk(A) -> goal)) # label(d_cons) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  2 (all A (drunk(A) & neg_psi)) # label(neg_phi) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  3 neg_psi -> (exists A not_drunk(A)) # label(neg_psi_ax) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/0.98  4 -drunk(A) | -not_drunk(A) | goal # label(d_cons) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98  5 drunk(A) # label(neg_phi) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -not_drunk(A) | goal.  [resolve(4,a,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  6 -not_drunk(A) | goal.  [resolve(4,a,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  7 -neg_psi | not_drunk(c1) # label(neg_psi_ax) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: goal | -neg_psi.  [resolve(6,a,7,b)].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Auto_denials:
% 0.44/0.98    % copying label goal_to_be_proved to answer in negative clause
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/0.98  Function symbol KB weights: 
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: goal_to_be_proved.
% 0.44/0.98  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.44/0.98  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.44/0.98  % Maximum clause weight is 2.000.
% 0.44/0.98  % Given clauses 3.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  1 (all A (drunk(A) & not_drunk(A) -> goal)) # label(d_cons) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  2 (all A (drunk(A) & neg_psi)) # label(neg_phi) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  3 neg_psi -> (exists A not_drunk(A)) # label(neg_psi_ax) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  4 -drunk(A) | -not_drunk(A) | goal # label(d_cons) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98  5 drunk(A) # label(neg_phi) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  6 -not_drunk(A) | goal.  [resolve(4,a,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  7 -neg_psi | not_drunk(c1) # label(neg_psi_ax) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.44/0.98  8 neg_psi # label(neg_phi) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  9 -goal # label(goal_to_be_proved) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goal_to_be_proved).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  10 goal | -neg_psi.  [resolve(6,a,7,b)].
% 0.44/0.98  11 -neg_psi # answer(goal_to_be_proved).  [resolve(10,a,9,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  12 $F # answer(goal_to_be_proved).  [resolve(11,a,8,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Given=3. Generated=4. Kept=4. proofs=1.
% 0.44/0.98  Usable=3. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=7. Hints=0.
% 0.44/0.98  Megabytes=0.02.
% 0.44/0.98  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Process 19999 exit (max_proofs) Fri Jul  1 15:47:33 2022
% 0.44/0.98  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------