TSTP Solution File: MSC011+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 18 05:29:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Sep 2 03:10:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34 [0.000053s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 Start search
% 0.12/0.34 nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.12/0.34 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0] ALPHA_AND : (! [A1_1] : (((drunk(A1_1) & not_drunk(A1_1)) => goal)) & ! [A2_2] : ((drunk(A2_2) & neg_psi)) & (neg_psi => ? [A3_3] : (not_drunk(A3_3))) & ~goal)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [1] ! [A1_1] : (((drunk(A1_1) & not_drunk(A1_1)) => goal)), ! [A2_2] : ((drunk(A2_2) & neg_psi)), (neg_psi => ? [A3_3] : (not_drunk(A3_3))), ~goal
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [1] BETA_IMPLY : (neg_psi => ? [A3_3] : (not_drunk(A3_3)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [2] ~neg_psi
% 0.12/0.35 -> [3] ? [A3_3] : (not_drunk(A3_3))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [2] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [A1_1] : (((drunk(A1_1) & not_drunk(A1_1)) => goal))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [4] ((drunk(A1_0_0) & not_drunk(A1_0_0)) => goal)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [4] BETA_IMPLY : ((drunk(A1_0_0) & not_drunk(A1_0_0)) => goal)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [5] ~(drunk(A1_0_0) & not_drunk(A1_0_0))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [6] goal
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [6] CLOSURE : goal
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [5] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(drunk(A1_0_0) & not_drunk(A1_0_0))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [7] ~drunk(A1_0_0)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [8] ~not_drunk(A1_0_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [7] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [A2_2] : ((drunk(A2_2) & neg_psi))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [11] (drunk(A2_0_1) & neg_psi)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [11] ALPHA_AND : (drunk(A2_0_1) & neg_psi)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [13] drunk(A2_0_1), neg_psi
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [13] CLOSURE : drunk(A2_0_1)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [8] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [A2_2] : ((drunk(A2_2) & neg_psi))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [12] (drunk(A2_1_1) & neg_psi)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [12] ALPHA_AND : (drunk(A2_1_1) & neg_psi)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [16] drunk(A2_1_1), neg_psi
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [16] CLOSURE : neg_psi
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [3] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [A3_3] : (not_drunk(A3_3))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [9] not_drunk(skolem_A33)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [9] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [A1_1] : (((drunk(A1_1) & not_drunk(A1_1)) => goal))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [10] ((drunk(skolem_A33) & not_drunk(skolem_A33)) => goal)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [10] BETA_IMPLY : ((drunk(skolem_A33) & not_drunk(skolem_A33)) => goal)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [14] ~(drunk(skolem_A33) & not_drunk(skolem_A33))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [15] goal
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [15] CLOSURE : goal
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [14] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(drunk(skolem_A33) & not_drunk(skolem_A33))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [17] ~drunk(skolem_A33)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [18] ~not_drunk(skolem_A33)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [18] CLOSURE : ~not_drunk(skolem_A33)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [17] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [A2_2] : ((drunk(A2_2) & neg_psi))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [19] (drunk(A2_2_1) & neg_psi)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [19] ALPHA_AND : (drunk(A2_2_1) & neg_psi)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [20] drunk(A2_2_1), neg_psi
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [20] CLOSURE : drunk(A2_2_1)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0.012203s][1][Res] 24 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.35 ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.35 [0.012255s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------