TSTP Solution File: MSC011+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:39:15 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (   9   ~;   6   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   2 sgn;   4   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d_cons,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( drunk(X1)
        & not_drunk(X1) )
     => goal ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vwrlGk9RZQ/E---3.1_31882.p',d_cons) ).

fof(neg_phi,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( drunk(X1)
      & neg_psi ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vwrlGk9RZQ/E---3.1_31882.p',neg_phi) ).

fof(goal_to_be_proved,conjecture,
    goal,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vwrlGk9RZQ/E---3.1_31882.p',goal_to_be_proved) ).

fof(neg_psi_ax,axiom,
    ( neg_psi
   => ? [X1] : not_drunk(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vwrlGk9RZQ/E---3.1_31882.p',neg_psi_ax) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ drunk(X2)
      | ~ not_drunk(X2)
      | goal ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d_cons])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( drunk(X4)
      & neg_psi ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[neg_phi]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ goal,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goal_to_be_proved])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ neg_psi
    | not_drunk(esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[neg_psi_ax])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( goal
    | ~ drunk(X1)
    | ~ not_drunk(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    drunk(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ goal,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( not_drunk(esk1_0)
    | ~ neg_psi ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    neg_psi,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ~ not_drunk(X1),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem    : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 11:38:29 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vwrlGk9RZQ/E---3.1_31882.p
% 0.20/0.48  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # new_bool_3 with pid 31977 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.48  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 31981 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.48  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.48  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.48  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.48  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.20/0.48  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.20/0.48  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.20/0.48  # Processed clauses                    : 5
% 0.20/0.48  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4
% 0.20/0.48  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.20/0.48  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.20/0.48  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.20/0.48  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.48  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.20/0.48  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.48  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.48  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 138
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.48  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1604 pages
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.48  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.20/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------