%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:21:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.75s 3.96s
% Output   : Proof 3.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 13:39:33 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.75/3.96  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.75/3.96  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A : Iota), And (drunk A) (not_drunk A) → goal) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A : Iota), And (drunk A) neg_psi) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (neg_psi → Exists fun A => not_drunk A) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not goal) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): Eq goal False
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #5 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (drunk a) (not_drunk a) → goal) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (And (drunk a) (not_drunk a)) False) (Eq goal True)
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq goal True) (Or (Eq (drunk a) False) (Eq (not_drunk a) False))
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #8 (by forward demodulation #[7, 4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq False True) (Or (Eq (drunk a) False) (Eq (not_drunk a) False))
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (drunk a) False) (Eq (not_drunk a) False)
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #10 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (drunk a) neg_psi) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): Eq neg_psi True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (drunk a) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #13 (by superposition #[12, 9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (not_drunk a) False)
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (not_drunk a) False
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #16 (by betaEtaReduce #[2]): Eq (neg_psi → Exists not_drunk) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): Or (Eq neg_psi False) (Eq (Exists not_drunk) True)
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq neg_psi False) (Eq (not_drunk (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #19 (by forward demodulation #[18, 11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (not_drunk (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (not_drunk (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #21 (by superposition #[20, 14]): Eq True False
% 3.75/3.96  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): False
% 3.75/3.96  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------