TSTP Solution File: MSC011+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:20:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 14:07:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.61  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.61  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.61  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61  % File     : MSC011+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.20/0.61  % Domain   : Miscellaneous
% 0.20/0.61  % Problem  : Drinker paradox
% 0.20/0.61  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.20/0.61  % English  :
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  % Refs     : [Bez05] Bezem (2005), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.61  % Source   : [Bez05]
% 0.20/0.61  % Names    : drinker [Bez05]
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.61  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   1 unt;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of atoms       :    8 (   0 equ)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of connectives :    4 (   0   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
% 0.20/0.62  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   2   !;   1   ?)
% 0.20/0.62  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  % Comments :
% 0.20/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  fof(d_cons,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( ( drunk(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & not_drunk(A) )
% 0.20/0.62       => goal ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(neg_phi,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( drunk(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & neg_psi ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(neg_psi_ax,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ( neg_psi
% 0.20/0.62     => ? [A] : not_drunk(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(goal_to_be_proved,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.62      goal ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.62  %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.62  %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1)
% 0.20/0.62  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.20/0.62  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.62  %SharedTerms:7
% 0.20/0.62  %goalClause: 2
% 0.20/0.62  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.62  [1]P1(a500)
% 0.20/0.62  [2]~P2(a500)
% 0.20/0.62  [3]P3(a1)+~P1(a500)
% 0.20/0.62  [4]~P3(x41)+P2(a500)
% 0.20/0.62  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  cnf(6,plain,
% 0.20/0.62     ($false),
% 0.20/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,4,3]),
% 0.20/0.62     ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.62  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.62  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------