TSTP Solution File: MSC005-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MSC005-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:59:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.09s 11.29s
% Output : Refutation 11.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : MSC005-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 16:23:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34 Fri Jul 1 16:23:37 2022
% 0.12/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4265.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.34 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.34 in usable.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.91/1.09 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.91/1.09 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.91/1.09 number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.91/1.09 number of clauses initially in problem: 7
% 0.91/1.09 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 0.91/1.09 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.91/1.09 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.91/1.09 absolute distinct symbol count: 4
% 0.91/1.09 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.91/1.09 distinct function count: 1
% 0.91/1.09 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 =========== start of search ===========
% 9.66/9.87
% 9.66/9.87
% 9.66/9.87 Changing weight limit from 60 to 21.
% 9.66/9.87
% 9.66/9.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.66/9.87
% 9.66/9.87 Model 3 [ 1 0 174 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.66/9.87
% 9.66/9.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Model 4 [ 1 43 66366 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Model 5 [ 1 92 105677 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Model 6 [ 1 0 150 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Model 7 [ 1 1 4514 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Model 8 [ 2 5 9947 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Model 9 [ 1 32 60798 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.66/9.88
% 9.66/9.88 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 60 givens.
% 9.66/9.88
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 10.93 sec ----> 17856 [binary,17855.1,5.1] {+} $F.
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 4.
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 11.09/11.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.09/11.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 1 [] {+} -value(A,truth)| -value(B,truth)|value(xor(A,B),falsity).
% 11.09/11.29 2 [] {+} -value(A,truth)| -value(B,falsity)|value(xor(A,B),truth).
% 11.09/11.29 4 [] {+} -value(A,falsity)| -value(B,falsity)|value(xor(A,B),falsity).
% 11.09/11.29 5 [] {+} -value(xor(xor(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),falsity),A).
% 11.09/11.29 6 [] {+} value(truth,truth).
% 11.09/11.29 7 [] {+} value(falsity,falsity).
% 11.09/11.29 11 [hyper,7,2,6] {+} value(xor(truth,falsity),truth).
% 11.09/11.29 38 [hyper,11,2,7] {-} value(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth).
% 11.09/11.29 151 [hyper,38,1,6] {+} value(xor(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),falsity).
% 11.09/11.29 17855 [hyper,151,4,7] {-} value(xor(xor(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),falsity),falsity).
% 11.09/11.29 17856 [binary,17855.1,5.1] {+} $F.
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 % SZS output end Refutation
% 11.09/11.29 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 ============ end of search ============
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 true clauses given 62 (37.6%)
% 11.09/11.29 false clauses given 103
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 FALSE TRUE
% 11.09/11.29 9 0 36
% 11.09/11.29 11 0 264
% 11.09/11.29 13 0 692
% 11.09/11.29 15 173 1508
% 11.09/11.29 17 532 0
% 11.09/11.29 19 1019 0
% 11.09/11.29 21 776 0
% 11.09/11.29 tot: 2500 2500 (50.0% true)
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 Model 9 [ 1 32 60798 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 11.09/11.29
% 11.09/11.29 Process 4265 finished Fri Jul 1 16:23:48 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------