TSTP Solution File: MSC005-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : MSC005-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:56:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : MSC005-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 16:26:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.40/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.40/0.98 Process 30213 was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.40/0.98 Fri Jul 1 16:26:41 2022
% 0.40/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_30060_n014.cluster.edu".
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_30060_n014.cluster.edu
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.40/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.40/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.40/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.40/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.40/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.40/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.40/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.40/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.40/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (7 formulas)
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 Auto_denials:
% 0.40/0.98 % copying label evaluate_expression to answer in negative clause
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.40/0.98 Function symbol KB weights: falsity=1. truth=1. xor=1.
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.40/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: evaluate_expression.
% 0.40/0.98 % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.40/0.98 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.40/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.40/0.98 % Given clauses 17.
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 1 value(truth,truth) # label(true_is_true) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.98 2 value(falsity,falsity) # label(false_is_false) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.98 3 -value(xor(xor(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),falsity),A) # label(evaluate_expression) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(evaluate_expression). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.98 4 -value(A,truth) | -value(B,truth) | value(xor(A,B),falsity) # label(true_xor_true) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.98 5 -value(A,truth) | -value(B,falsity) | value(xor(A,B),truth) # label(true_xor_false) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.98 7 -value(A,falsity) | -value(B,falsity) | value(xor(A,B),falsity) # label(false_xor_false) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.98 11 value(xor(truth,falsity),truth). [ur(5,a,1,a,b,2,a)].
% 0.40/0.98 17 -value(xor(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),falsity) # answer(evaluate_expression). [ur(7,b,2,a,c,3,a)].
% 0.40/0.98 36 value(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth). [ur(5,a,11,a,b,2,a)].
% 0.40/0.98 74 -value(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth) # answer(evaluate_expression). [ur(4,b,1,a,c,17,a)].
% 0.40/0.98 75 $F # answer(evaluate_expression). [resolve(74,a,36,a)].
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 Given=17. Generated=81. Kept=74. proofs=1.
% 0.40/0.98 Usable=17. Sos=45. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=17. Hints=0.
% 0.40/0.98 Megabytes=0.07.
% 0.40/0.98 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.40/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.40/0.98
% 0.40/0.98 Process 30213 exit (max_proofs) Fri Jul 1 16:26:41 2022
% 0.40/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------