TSTP Solution File: MSC005-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : MSC005-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:39:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(evaluate_expression,negated_conjecture,
~ value(xor(xor(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),falsity),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KhW8sHfGzk/E---3.1_19492.p',evaluate_expression) ).
cnf(false_xor_false,axiom,
( value(xor(X1,X2),falsity)
| ~ value(X1,falsity)
| ~ value(X2,falsity) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KhW8sHfGzk/E---3.1_19492.p',false_xor_false) ).
cnf(false_is_false,axiom,
value(falsity,falsity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KhW8sHfGzk/E---3.1_19492.p',false_is_false) ).
cnf(true_xor_true,axiom,
( value(xor(X1,X2),falsity)
| ~ value(X1,truth)
| ~ value(X2,truth) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KhW8sHfGzk/E---3.1_19492.p',true_xor_true) ).
cnf(true_is_true,axiom,
value(truth,truth),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KhW8sHfGzk/E---3.1_19492.p',true_is_true) ).
cnf(true_xor_false,axiom,
( value(xor(X1,X2),truth)
| ~ value(X1,truth)
| ~ value(X2,falsity) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KhW8sHfGzk/E---3.1_19492.p',true_xor_false) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ value(xor(xor(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),falsity),X1),
evaluate_expression ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( value(xor(X1,X2),falsity)
| ~ value(X1,falsity)
| ~ value(X2,falsity) ),
false_xor_false ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
value(falsity,falsity),
false_is_false ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ value(xor(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),falsity),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( value(xor(X1,X2),falsity)
| ~ value(X1,truth)
| ~ value(X2,truth) ),
true_xor_true ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
value(truth,truth),
true_is_true ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ value(xor(xor(truth,falsity),falsity),truth),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( value(xor(X1,X2),truth)
| ~ value(X1,truth)
| ~ value(X2,falsity) ),
true_xor_false ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ value(xor(truth,falsity),truth),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]),c_0_8]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MSC005-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:14:45 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KhW8sHfGzk/E---3.1_19492.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 19588 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 19592 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 9
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 244
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------