TSTP Solution File: MSC003-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : MSC003-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:56:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.70s 0.98s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : MSC003-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 15:10:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.70/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.70/0.98  Process 23423 was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.70/0.98  Fri Jul  1 15:10:59 2022
% 0.70/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_23269_n021.cluster.edu".
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_23269_n021.cluster.edu
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.70/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.70/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.70/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.70/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.70/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.70/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.70/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.70/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.70/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (8 formulas)
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.70/0.98  Function symbol KB weights:  arm=1. boy=1. hand=1. human=1. fingers=1. john=1. n1=1. n2=1. n5=1. times=1. object_in=1.
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.70/0.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/0.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.70/0.98  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.70/0.98  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.70/0.98  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.70/0.98  % Given clauses 12.
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  1 in(john,boy) # label(john_is_a_boy) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.70/0.98  2 -has_parts(john,times(n2,n1),hand) # label(prove_john_has_2_hands) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.70/0.98  3 in(A,human) | -in(A,boy) # label(in_boy_in_human) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.70/0.98  5 has_parts(A,n2,arm) | -in(A,human) # label(humans_have_two_arms) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.70/0.98  6 has_parts(A,n1,hand) | -in(A,arm) # label(arms_have_one_hand) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.70/0.98  7 in(object_in(A,B,C,D,E),B) | has_parts(A,times(D,E),C) | -has_parts(A,D,B) # label(not_part_inheritance) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/0.98  8 has_parts(A,times(B,C),D) | -has_parts(A,B,E) | -has_parts(object_in(A,E,D,B,C),C,D) # label(part_inheritance) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.70/0.98  9 in(john,human).  [resolve(3,b,1,a)].
% 0.70/0.98  10 has_parts(john,n2,arm).  [resolve(9,a,5,b)].
% 0.70/0.98  11 in(object_in(john,arm,A,n2,B),arm) | has_parts(john,times(n2,B),A).  [resolve(10,a,7,c)].
% 0.70/0.98  12 -has_parts(object_in(john,arm,hand,n2,n1),n1,hand).  [ur(8,a,2,a,b,10,a)].
% 0.70/0.98  14 in(object_in(john,arm,hand,n2,n1),arm).  [resolve(11,b,2,a)].
% 0.70/0.98  15 $F.  [resolve(14,a,6,b),unit_del(a,12)].
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  Given=12. Generated=15. Kept=14. proofs=1.
% 0.70/0.98  Usable=12. Sos=2. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=8. Hints=0.
% 0.70/0.98  Megabytes=0.04.
% 0.70/0.98  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.70/0.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.70/0.98  
% 0.70/0.98  Process 23423 exit (max_proofs) Fri Jul  1 15:10:59 2022
% 0.70/0.98  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------