TSTP Solution File: MSC002-2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : MSC002-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:51:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 72 ( 40 ~; 31 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 73 ( 73 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f22,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f1,f1,f1,f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ at(X0,here,X1)
| ~ at(X0,X2,X3)
| ~ at(X0,X4,X3) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f20,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( at(X0,X2,let_go(X1))
| ~ at(X0,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',situation_let_go) ).
fof(f20,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ at(X0,X4,let_go(X3))
| ~ at(X0,here,X1)
| ~ at(X0,X2,X3) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : ~ held(X0,let_go(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cant_hold_and_let_go) ).
fof(f19,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ at(X0,X4,let_go(X3))
| ~ at(X0,here,X1)
| ~ at(X0,X2,X3)
| held(X0,let_go(X3)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f18,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( at(X0,X2,go(X3,X1))
| ~ at(X0,X2,X1)
| held(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thing_either_held_or_went_there) ).
fof(f18,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ at(X0,X4,go(X2,let_go(X3)))
| ~ at(X0,here,X1)
| ~ at(X0,X2,X3) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( at(X0,X2,pick_up(X1))
| ~ at(X0,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',situation_pick_up) ).
fof(f17,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ at(X0,X1,pick_up(go(X2,let_go(X3))))
| ~ at(X0,here,X4)
| ~ at(X0,X2,X3) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f16,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( red(X0)
| ~ at(X0,here,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',everything_is_red) ).
fof(f16,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ red(X0)
| ~ at(X0,X1,pick_up(go(X2,let_go(X3))))
| ~ at(X0,X2,X3) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f15,f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ put(X0,there,X1)
| ~ red(X0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7,f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ answer(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_an_answer_situation) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( answer(X1)
| ~ put(X0,there,X1)
| ~ red(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',answer_if_red_and_put_there) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( put(X0,X1,go(X1,pick_up(go(X2,let_go(X3)))))
| ~ at(X0,X4,pick_up(go(X2,let_go(X3))))
| ~ at(X0,X2,X3) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f14,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( grabbed(X0,pick_up(go(X2,let_go(X1))))
| ~ at(X0,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',can_grab_if_previously_let_go) ).
fof(f14,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ grabbed(X0,X1)
| put(X0,X2,go(X2,X1))
| ~ at(X0,X3,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f12,f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( sP0(X0,X1)
| ~ at(X0,X2,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11_D]) ).
fof(f11_D,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( ! [X2] : ~ at(X0,X2,X1)
<=> ~ sP0(X0,X1) ),
introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
| ~ grabbed(X0,X1)
| put(X0,X3,go(X3,X1)) ),
inference(general_splitting,[],[f8,f11_D]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ at(X0,X2,X1)
| put(X0,X3,go(X3,X1))
| ~ grabbed(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',can_put_somewhere_if_grab_and_go_there) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
at(something,here,now),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',something_is_here_now) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : MSC002-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 03:21:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.50 % (24721)dis+1011_3:29_av=off:awrs=decay:awrsf=32:bce=on:drc=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:nwc=2.0:spb=goal_then_units:updr=off:urr=ec_only:i=29:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/29Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)Time elapsed: 0.063 s
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (24721)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (24706)Success in time 0.162 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------