TSTP Solution File: MGT060-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : MGT060-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:38:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.02s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.02s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 50 ( 23 unt; 18 nHn; 44 RR)
% Number of literals : 133 ( 34 equ; 51 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(assumption_17_32,axiom,
( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_17_32) ).
cnf(assumption_17_33,axiom,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_17_33) ).
cnf(assumption_17_35,axiom,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| positional_advantage(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_17_35) ).
cnf(assumption_17_34,axiom,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_17_34) ).
cnf(assumption_17_36,axiom,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X2)
| positional_advantage(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
| ~ organization(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_17_36) ).
cnf(assumption_3_45,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_3_45) ).
cnf(assumption_3_42,negated_conjecture,
organization(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_3_42) ).
cnf(meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10,axiom,
( greater(X1,X3)
| ~ greater(X1,X2)
| ~ greater(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10) ).
cnf(assumption_3_43,negated_conjecture,
has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_3_43) ).
cnf(assumption_18c_39,axiom,
greater(low,very_low),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_18c_39) ).
cnf(assumption_18e_41,axiom,
greater(mod2,low),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_18e_41) ).
cnf(assumption_18d_40,axiom,
greater(high,mod2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_18d_40) ).
cnf(assumption_3_44,negated_conjecture,
~ has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_3_44) ).
cnf(assumption_18b_38,axiom,
greater(mod1,low),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p',assumption_18b_38) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| positional_advantage(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X2)
| positional_advantage(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
| ~ organization(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_3_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
organization(sk1),
assumption_3_42 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( greater(X1,X3)
| ~ greater(X1,X2)
| ~ greater(X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| positional_advantage(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( has_immunity(X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X2)
| positional_advantage(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
| ~ organization(X1) ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = very_low
| ~ has_immunity(sk1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
assumption_3_43 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( greater(X1,X3)
| ~ greater(X1,X2)
| ~ greater(X2,X3) ),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
greater(low,very_low),
assumption_18c_39 ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
| has_immunity(X1,X2)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
| is_aligned(X1,X2)
| has_immunity(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
greater(mod2,low),
assumption_18e_41 ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),very_low),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( greater(X1,very_low)
| ~ greater(X1,low) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
| has_immunity(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( greater(X1,low)
| ~ greater(X1,mod2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
greater(high,mod2),
assumption_18d_40 ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_3_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),low),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = mod2
| hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = low
| hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = high
| hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = mod1
| has_immunity(sk1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
greater(high,low),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
c_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = mod1
| hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = low
| hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = mod2 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = low
| hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = mod1 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_45]),c_0_34])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,axiom,
greater(mod1,low),
assumption_18b_38 ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = low,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_48]),c_0_31])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : MGT060-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:12:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6zJKWQErut/E---3.1_26092.p
% 1.02/0.64 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.02/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.02/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 26178 completed with status 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 1.02/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.02/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.02/0.64 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 1.02/0.64 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 26182 completed with status 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 1.02/0.64 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.02/0.64 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.02/0.64 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 1.02/0.64 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.02/0.64 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 1.02/0.64 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 1.02/0.64 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.02/0.64
% 1.02/0.64 # Proof found!
% 1.02/0.64 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.02/0.64 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.02/0.64 # Parsed axioms : 25
% 1.02/0.64 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Initial clauses : 25
% 1.02/0.64 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 1.02/0.64 # Processed clauses : 1142
% 1.02/0.64 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # ...subsumed : 867
% 1.02/0.64 # ...remaining for further processing : 275
% 1.02/0.64 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 1.02/0.64 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Backward-subsumed : 14
% 1.02/0.64 # Backward-rewritten : 72
% 1.02/0.64 # Generated clauses : 5701
% 1.02/0.64 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4460
% 1.02/0.64 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Paramodulations : 5645
% 1.02/0.64 # Factorizations : 54
% 1.02/0.64 # NegExts : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 1.02/0.64 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Total rewrite steps : 1474
% 1.02/0.64 # ...of those cached : 1466
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.64 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.64 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.64 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.64 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.02/0.64 # Current number of processed clauses : 162
% 1.02/0.64 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 1.02/0.64 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 1.02/0.64 # Non-unit-clauses : 141
% 1.02/0.64 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3289
% 1.02/0.64 # ...number of literals in the above : 18178
% 1.02/0.64 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Current number of archived clauses : 111
% 1.02/0.64 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10728
% 1.02/0.64 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5316
% 1.02/0.64 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 334
% 1.02/0.64 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 147
% 1.02/0.64 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 1.02/0.64 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 1.02/0.64 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.02/0.64 # Termbank termtop insertions : 74710
% 1.02/0.64 # Search garbage collected termcells : 38
% 1.02/0.64
% 1.02/0.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.02/0.64 # User time : 0.120 s
% 1.02/0.64 # System time : 0.007 s
% 1.02/0.64 # Total time : 0.127 s
% 1.02/0.64 # Maximum resident set size: 1652 pages
% 1.02/0.64
% 1.02/0.64 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.02/0.64 # User time : 0.676 s
% 1.02/0.64 # System time : 0.014 s
% 1.02/0.64 # Total time : 0.690 s
% 1.02/0.64 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 1.02/0.64 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------