TSTP Solution File: MGT059+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:43:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.16s 1.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 125 ( 44 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 139 ( 43 ~; 33 |; 45 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 18 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 0 sgn 19 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X3] :
( organization(X0)
=> ( ( ~ has_immunity(X0,X3)
=> ( ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X0,X3)
& ~ is_aligned(X0,X3) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = high )
& ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X0,X3)
& is_aligned(X0,X3) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = mod2 )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X0,X3)
& ~ is_aligned(X0,X3) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = mod1 )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X0,X3)
& is_aligned(X0,X3) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = low ) ) )
& ( has_immunity(X0,X3)
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = very_low ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17) ).
fof(f8,conjecture,
! [X0,X4,X3] :
( ( has_immunity(X0,X3)
& has_immunity(X0,X4)
& organization(X0) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_2) ).
fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X4,X3] :
( ( has_immunity(X0,X3)
& has_immunity(X0,X4)
& organization(X0) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X4) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( organization(X0)
=> ( ( ~ has_immunity(X0,X1)
=> ( ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
& ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
=> high = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) )
& ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
& is_aligned(X0,X1) )
=> mod2 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X0,X1)
& ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
=> mod1 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X0,X1)
& is_aligned(X0,X1) )
=> low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) ) ) )
& ( has_immunity(X0,X1)
=> very_low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( has_immunity(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X1)
& organization(X0) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X2) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( ( ( high = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( mod2 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( mod1 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) ) )
| has_immunity(X0,X1) )
& ( very_low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ organization(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( ( ( high = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( mod2 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( mod1 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) ) )
| has_immunity(X0,X1) )
& ( very_low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ organization(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) != hazard_of_mortality(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X1)
& organization(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) != hazard_of_mortality(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X1)
& organization(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) != hazard_of_mortality(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X1)
& organization(X0) )
=> ( hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1) != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK2)
& has_immunity(sK0,sK2)
& has_immunity(sK0,sK1)
& organization(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1) != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK2)
& has_immunity(sK0,sK2)
& has_immunity(sK0,sK1)
& organization(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f20,f21]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( very_low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X0,X1)
| ~ organization(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
organization(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
has_immunity(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
has_immunity(sK0,sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1) != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
( ~ has_immunity(X0,X1)
| ~ organization(X0)
| hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) = very_low ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).
cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1) != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).
cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
has_immunity(sK0,sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
has_immunity(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).
cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
organization(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).
cnf(c_229,plain,
( X0 != sK0
| ~ has_immunity(X0,X1)
| hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) = very_low ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_61]) ).
cnf(c_230,plain,
( ~ has_immunity(sK0,X0)
| hazard_of_mortality(sK0,X0) = very_low ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_229]) ).
cnf(c_376,plain,
( X0 != sK2
| sK0 != sK0
| hazard_of_mortality(sK0,X0) = very_low ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_230]) ).
cnf(c_377,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK2) = very_low,
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_376]) ).
cnf(c_381,plain,
( X0 != sK1
| sK0 != sK0
| hazard_of_mortality(sK0,X0) = very_low ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_230]) ).
cnf(c_382,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1) = very_low,
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_381]) ).
cnf(c_503,plain,
very_low != very_low,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_377,c_382]) ).
cnf(c_504,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_503]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 22:59:05 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.16/1.23 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.16/1.23 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.16/1.23
% 1.16/1.23 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.16/1.23
% 1.16/1.23 ------ iProver source info
% 1.16/1.23
% 1.16/1.23 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.16/1.23 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.16/1.23 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.16/1.23
% 1.16/1.23 ------ Parsing...
% 1.16/1.23 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.16/1.23
% 1.16/1.23 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e
% 1.16/1.23
% 1.16/1.23 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.16/1.23
% 1.16/1.23 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.16/1.23
% 1.16/1.23
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------