TSTP Solution File: MGT059+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:42:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.52s 0.72s
% Output : Refutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 112 ( 34 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 129 ( 39 ~; 27 |; 45 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 18 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 20 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f44,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f43,f24]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
has_immunity(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK2) != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1)
& has_immunity(sK0,sK2)
& has_immunity(sK0,sK1)
& organization(sK0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f14,f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
( hazard_of_mortality(X0,X2) != hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
& has_immunity(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X1)
& organization(X0) )
=> ( hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK2) != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1)
& has_immunity(sK0,sK2)
& has_immunity(sK0,sK1)
& organization(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( hazard_of_mortality(X0,X2) != hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
& has_immunity(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X1)
& organization(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2] :
( hazard_of_mortality(X0,X2) != hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
& has_immunity(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X1)
& organization(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( has_immunity(X0,X2)
& has_immunity(X0,X1)
& organization(X0) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X2) = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X4,X3] :
( ( has_immunity(X0,X3)
& has_immunity(X0,X4)
& organization(X0) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X4) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,conjecture,
! [X0,X4,X3] :
( ( has_immunity(X0,X3)
& has_immunity(X0,X4)
& organization(X0) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_2) ).
fof(f43,plain,
~ has_immunity(sK0,sK1),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f42]) ).
fof(f42,plain,
( very_low != very_low
| ~ has_immunity(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f41,f39]) ).
fof(f39,plain,
! [X0] :
( very_low = hazard_of_mortality(sK0,X0)
| ~ has_immunity(sK0,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f27,f23]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
organization(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ organization(X0)
| ~ has_immunity(X0,X1)
| very_low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( ( ( high = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( mod2 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( mod1 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) ) )
| has_immunity(X0,X1) )
& ( very_low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ organization(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( ( ( high = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( mod2 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( mod1 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) ) )
| has_immunity(X0,X1) )
& ( very_low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ organization(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( organization(X0)
=> ( ( ~ has_immunity(X0,X1)
=> ( ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
& ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
=> high = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) )
& ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X0,X1)
& is_aligned(X0,X1) )
=> mod2 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X0,X1)
& ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
=> mod1 = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X0,X1)
& is_aligned(X0,X1) )
=> low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) ) ) )
& ( has_immunity(X0,X1)
=> very_low = hazard_of_mortality(X0,X1) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X3] :
( organization(X0)
=> ( ( ~ has_immunity(X0,X3)
=> ( ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X0,X3)
& ~ is_aligned(X0,X3) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = high )
& ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X0,X3)
& is_aligned(X0,X3) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = mod2 )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X0,X3)
& ~ is_aligned(X0,X3) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = mod1 )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X0,X3)
& is_aligned(X0,X3) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = low ) ) )
& ( has_immunity(X0,X3)
=> hazard_of_mortality(X0,X3) = very_low ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17) ).
fof(f41,plain,
very_low != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f40,f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
has_immunity(sK0,sK2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
( very_low != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1)
| ~ has_immunity(sK0,sK2) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f26,f39]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK2) != hazard_of_mortality(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.15/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Sat May 18 23:58:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/0.71 % (30523)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30525)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30521)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30524)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30526)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.52/0.71
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)Memory used [KB]: 967
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.52/0.71
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30528)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.52/0.71
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)Memory used [KB]: 968
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)Memory used [KB]: 967
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.52/0.71 % (30523)First to succeed.
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30526)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30528)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30524)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (30527)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.52/0.71 % (30523)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-30520"
% 0.52/0.71
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)Memory used [KB]: 966
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.71 % (30527)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.72 % (30523)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.52/0.72 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.72 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.52/0.72 % (30523)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.72 % (30523)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.52/0.72 % (30523)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.52/0.72
% 0.52/0.72 % (30523)Memory used [KB]: 996
% 0.52/0.72 % (30523)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.52/0.72 % (30523)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.52/0.72 % (30520)Success in time 0.337 s
% 0.52/0.72 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------