TSTP Solution File: MGT052+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : MGT052+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:42:27 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.54s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 44 ( 20 ~; 10 |; 4 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 30 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f26,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f23]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
is_aligned(sK0,sK1),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( is_aligned(sK0,sK1)
| is_aligned(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f20,f19]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
dissimilar(sK0,sK1,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
dissimilar(sK0,sK1,sK1),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f14,f16]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] : dissimilar(X0,X1,X1)
=> dissimilar(sK0,sK1,sK1) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
? [X0,X1] : dissimilar(X0,X1,X1),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
~ ! [X0,X1] : ~ dissimilar(X0,X1,X1),
inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X4] : ~ dissimilar(X0,X4,X4),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,conjecture,
! [X0,X4] : ~ dissimilar(X0,X4,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',background_assumption_1) ).
fof(f20,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ dissimilar(X0,X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X0,X1)
| is_aligned(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( ( ~ is_aligned(X0,X2)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1) )
& ( is_aligned(X0,X2)
| is_aligned(X0,X1) ) )
| ~ dissimilar(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( is_aligned(X0,X1)
<~> is_aligned(X0,X2) )
| ~ dissimilar(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( dissimilar(X0,X1,X2)
=> ~ ( is_aligned(X0,X1)
<=> is_aligned(X0,X2) ) ),
inference(pure_predicate_removal,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( dissimilar(X0,X1,X2)
=> ( ~ ( is_aligned(X0,X1)
<=> is_aligned(X0,X2) )
& organization(X0) ) ),
inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( dissimilar(X0,X1,X2)
<=> ( ~ ( is_aligned(X0,X1)
<=> is_aligned(X0,X2) )
& organization(X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X3,X4] :
( dissimilar(X0,X3,X4)
<=> ( ~ ( is_aligned(X0,X3)
<=> is_aligned(X0,X4) )
& organization(X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).
fof(f25,plain,
~ is_aligned(sK0,sK1),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f24]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
( ~ is_aligned(sK0,sK1)
| ~ is_aligned(sK0,sK1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f21,f19]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ dissimilar(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MGT052+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:09:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_EPR_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9427)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.74
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)Memory used [KB]: 959
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (9427)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (9424)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9426)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9423)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9425)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.74
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)Memory used [KB]: 960
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (9425)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (9424)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)First to succeed.
% 0.54/0.74 % (9426)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-9421"
% 0.54/0.74 % (9423)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.74 % (9429)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9429)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9429)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (9429)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9429)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.74
% 0.54/0.74 % (9429)Memory used [KB]: 959
% 0.54/0.74 % (9429)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.54/0.74 % (9429)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.54/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.54/0.74
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)Memory used [KB]: 989
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.54/0.74 % (9422)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.54/0.74 % (9421)Success in time 0.387 s
% 0.54/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------