TSTP Solution File: MGT048+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.20s 1.46s
% Output   : Refutation 1.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : MGT048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 08:50:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Thu Jun  9 08:50:49 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5779.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 17
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 21
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.12/0.39     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.12/0.39     distinct function count: 4
% 0.12/0.39     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.20/1.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.20/1.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.08 sec ----> 3875 [binary,3874.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.20/1.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.20/1.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  3 [] {+} smaller_or_equal(A,B)|A!=B.
% 1.20/1.46  12 [] {+} -organization(A)| -smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(A,B),stock_of_knowledge(A,C))| -greater(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C))|smaller(capability(A,B),capability(A,C)).
% 1.20/1.46  14 [] {+} -organization(A)|stock_of_knowledge(A,B)=stock_of_knowledge(A,C).
% 1.20/1.46  15 [] {+} -organization(A)| -greater(age(A,B),age(A,C))|greater(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C)).
% 1.20/1.46  16 [] {+} -smaller(capability($c3,$c1),capability($c3,$c2)).
% 1.20/1.46  19 [] {+} organization($c3).
% 1.20/1.46  20 [] {-} greater(age($c3,$c1),age($c3,$c2)).
% 1.20/1.46  51 [hyper,19,14] {+} stock_of_knowledge($c3,A)=stock_of_knowledge($c3,B).
% 1.20/1.46  55 [hyper,20,15,19] {-} greater(internal_friction($c3,$c1),internal_friction($c3,$c2)).
% 1.20/1.46  2447 [hyper,51,3] {+} smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge($c3,A),stock_of_knowledge($c3,B)).
% 1.20/1.46  3874 [hyper,2447,12,19,55] {-} smaller(capability($c3,$c1),capability($c3,$c2)).
% 1.20/1.46  3875 [binary,3874.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.20/1.46  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  ============ end of search ============
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  true clauses given          40      (38.1%)
% 1.20/1.46  false clauses given         65
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.20/1.46     8  0         5
% 1.20/1.46     9  0         3
% 1.20/1.46    12  0         228
% 1.20/1.46    13  32        143
% 1.20/1.46    14  2         6
% 1.20/1.46    15  32        81
% 1.20/1.46    16  1         25
% 1.20/1.46    17  5         10
% 1.20/1.46    18  0         2
% 1.20/1.46    19  863       435
% 1.20/1.46    20  0         45
% 1.20/1.46    21  466       241
% 1.20/1.46    22  6         44
% 1.20/1.46    23  21        45
% 1.20/1.46    24  40        82
% 1.20/1.46    25  26        34
% 1.20/1.46    26  0         11
% 1.20/1.46    27  5         17
% 1.20/1.46    28  45        71
% 1.20/1.46    29  0         16
% 1.20/1.46    30  0         8
% 1.20/1.46    31  10        56
% 1.20/1.46    32  5         98
% 1.20/1.46    33  0         4
% 1.20/1.46    34  0         6
% 1.20/1.46    36  0         7
% 1.20/1.46    37  0         41
% 1.20/1.46    39  0         173
% 1.20/1.46    40  0         13
% 1.20/1.46    44  0         50
% 1.20/1.46    45  0         14
% 1.20/1.46  tot:  1559      2014      (56.4% true)
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.20/1.46  
% 1.20/1.46  Process 5779 finished Thu Jun  9 08:50:50 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------