TSTP Solution File: MGT044-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT044-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.43s 1.65s
% Output   : Refutation 1.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : MGT044-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 10:10:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Thu Jun  9 10:10:34 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 1686.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 17
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 21
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.12/0.39     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.12/0.39     distinct function count: 4
% 0.12/0.39     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.43/1.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.43/1.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   1.27 sec ----> 4158 [hyper,2989,11,19,128,unit_del,16,17,17] {-} $F.
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.43/1.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.43/1.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  3 [] {+} A!=B|smaller_or_equal(A,B).
% 1.43/1.65  7 [] {+} -smaller(A,B)|greater(B,A).
% 1.43/1.65  9 [] {+} -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 1.43/1.65  11 [] {+} -organization(A)| -greater(stock_of_knowledge(A,B),stock_of_knowledge(A,C))| -smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C))|greater(capability(A,B),capability(A,C)).
% 1.43/1.65  14 [] {+} -organization(A)| -greater(age(A,B),age(A,C))|greater(stock_of_knowledge(A,B),stock_of_knowledge(A,C)).
% 1.43/1.65  15 [] {+} -organization(A)|internal_friction(A,B)=internal_friction(A,C).
% 1.43/1.65  16 [] {+} -greater(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)).
% 1.43/1.65  17 [factor,9.1.2] {+} -greater(A,A).
% 1.43/1.65  18 [] {+} smaller(A,B)|A=B|greater(A,B).
% 1.43/1.65  19 [] {+} organization(sk1).
% 1.43/1.65  20 [] {-} greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2)).
% 1.43/1.65  22 [hyper,18,7] {+} A=B|greater(A,B)|greater(B,A).
% 1.43/1.65  50 [hyper,19,15] {+} internal_friction(sk1,A)=internal_friction(sk1,B).
% 1.43/1.65  54 [hyper,20,14,19] {-} greater(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2)).
% 1.43/1.65  128 [para_from,22.1.1,54.1.1.1] {-} greater(stock_of_knowledge(A,sk3),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2))|greater(sk1,A)|greater(A,sk1).
% 1.43/1.65  2989 [hyper,50,3] {+} smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(sk1,A),internal_friction(sk1,B)).
% 1.43/1.65  4158 [hyper,2989,11,19,128,unit_del,16,17,17] {-} $F.
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.43/1.65  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  ============ end of search ============
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  true clauses given          41      (39.0%)
% 1.43/1.65  false clauses given         64
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.43/1.65     8  0         5
% 1.43/1.65     9  0         3
% 1.43/1.65    12  0         228
% 1.43/1.65    13  30        156
% 1.43/1.65    14  2         3
% 1.43/1.65    15  32        81
% 1.43/1.65    16  0         36
% 1.43/1.65    17  6         13
% 1.43/1.65    18  0         2
% 1.43/1.65    19  852       470
% 1.43/1.65    20  0         20
% 1.43/1.65    21  466       248
% 1.43/1.65    22  0         15
% 1.43/1.65    23  24        126
% 1.43/1.65    24  31        92
% 1.43/1.65    25  48        90
% 1.43/1.65    27  10        12
% 1.43/1.65    28  36        94
% 1.43/1.65    29  0         8
% 1.43/1.65    30  0         13
% 1.43/1.65    31  16        74
% 1.43/1.65    32  10        63
% 1.43/1.65    33  0         4
% 1.43/1.65    34  0         9
% 1.43/1.65    35  0         4
% 1.43/1.65    37  0         30
% 1.43/1.65    38  0         1
% 1.43/1.65    39  0         258
% 1.43/1.65    40  0         10
% 1.43/1.65    41  0         4
% 1.43/1.65    43  0         1
% 1.43/1.65    44  0         92
% 1.43/1.65    45  0         35
% 1.43/1.65    46  0         2
% 1.43/1.65    53  0         1
% 1.43/1.65  tot:  1563      2303      (59.6% true)
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.43/1.65  
% 1.43/1.65  Process 1686 finished Thu Jun  9 10:10:35 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------