TSTP Solution File: MGT040+2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : MGT040+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:43:40 EDT 2024

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.19s 0.37s
% Output   : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(u75,axiom,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X0))
    | in_environment(X0,critical_point(X0))
    | ~ greater(critical_point(X0),X1)
    | selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,end_time(X0))
    | ~ environment(X0) ) ).

cnf(u64,axiom,
    ( ~ sP0(X0)
    | environment(sK2(X0)) ) ).

cnf(u74,axiom,
    ( ~ in_environment(X0,X1)
    | greater(appear(efficient_producers,X0),X1)
    | greater_or_equal(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X0)) ) ).

cnf(u61,axiom,
    propagation_strategy(efficient_producers) ).

cnf(u66,axiom,
    ( ~ selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(sK2(X0)))
    | ~ sP0(X0) ) ).

cnf(u60,axiom,
    propagation_strategy(first_movers) ).

cnf(u63,axiom,
    ( ~ in_environment(X0,X1)
    | ~ empty(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | extreme(X0)
    | ~ observational_period(X0) ) ).

cnf(u68,axiom,
    ( ~ in_environment(X1,critical_point(X1))
    | ~ in_environment(X0,X1)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ rapid_change(X0)
    | ~ observational_period(X0) ) ).

cnf(u77,axiom,
    ( ~ observational_period(X0)
    | sP0(X0)
    | selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,X0) ) ).

cnf(u69,axiom,
    ( ~ environment(X0)
    | empty(X0)
    | greater_or_equal(end_time(X0),appear(an_organisation,X0)) ) ).

cnf(u62,axiom,
    ( ~ environment(X0)
    | in_environment(X0,end_time(X0)) ) ).

cnf(u55,negated_conjecture,
    rapid_change(sK1) ).

cnf(u57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK1) ).

cnf(u54,negated_conjecture,
    observational_period(sK1) ).

cnf(u56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ extreme(sK1) ).

cnf(u73,axiom,
    ( ~ selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1)
    | in_environment(X0,critical_point(X0))
    | selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,end_time(X0))
    | ~ greater(critical_point(X0),X1)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X0))
    | ~ environment(X0) ) ).

cnf(u78,negated_conjecture,
    ( selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sK1)
    | sP0(sK1) ) ).

cnf(u71,axiom,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X0,X1)
    | greater(X0,X1)
    | X0 = X1 ) ).

cnf(u59,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X0))
    | ~ greater(critical_point(X0),X1)
    | selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X0,critical_point(X0))
    | ~ environment(X0) ) ).

cnf(u70,axiom,
    ( ~ environment(X0)
    | in_environment(X0,critical_point(X0))
    | greater(critical_point(X0),end_time(X0)) ) ).

cnf(u58,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,appear(first_movers,X0))
    | ~ greater(appear(efficient_producers,X0),X1)
    | selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X0,X1)
    | ~ environment(X0) ) ).

cnf(u65,axiom,
    ( ~ sP0(X0)
    | in_environment(X0,sK2(X0)) ) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : MGT040+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 00:06:07 EDT 2024
% 0.19/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.35  % (26043)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.19/0.36  % (26046)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.19/0.36  % (26050)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.36  % (26045)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.36  % (26047)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.36  % (26044)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.36  % (26046)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.37  % (26048)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-26043"
% 0.19/0.37  % (26049)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.37  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)# SZS output start Saturation.
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)Termination reason: Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)Memory used [KB]: 827
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.37  % (26050)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.37  % (26043)Success in time 0.004 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------