TSTP Solution File: MGT034-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : MGT034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:22:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.42s 0.99s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : MGT034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:01:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/0.98 Process 6898 was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/0.98 Thu Jun 9 08:01:38 2022
% 0.42/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_6741_n021.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_6741_n021.cluster.edu
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (28 formulas)
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.42/0.98
% 0.42/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.42/0.98 1 -environment(A) | B != critical_point(A) | -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)) # label(d1_51) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 2 environment(sk1) # label(prove_t3_54) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: A != critical_point(sk1) | -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A)). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 3 -environment(A) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B) | -decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,B),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,B))) # label(l3_32) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,A) | -decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,A),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,A))). [resolve(3,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 4 -environment(A) | in_environment(A,start_time(A)) # label(mp_opening_time_in_duration_42) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: in_environment(sk1,start_time(sk1)). [resolve(4,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 5 -environment(A) | greater_or_equal(appear(first_movers,A),start_time(A)) # label(mp_no_FM_before_opening_43) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: greater_or_equal(appear(first_movers,sk1),start_time(sk1)). [resolve(5,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 6 -environment(A) | -in_environment(A,critical_point(A)) | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,critical_point(A)) # label(mp_critical_point_means_FM_and_EP_33) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -in_environment(sk1,critical_point(sk1)) | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,critical_point(sk1)). [resolve(6,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 7 -environment(A) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B) | subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,A,B) # label(mp_symmetry_of_FM_and_EP_44) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,A) | subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk1,A). [resolve(7,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 8 -environment(A) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B) | greater_or_equal(B,appear(efficient_producers,A)) # label(mp_FM_and_EP_members_EP_appeared_45) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,A) | greater_or_equal(A,appear(efficient_producers,sk1)). [resolve(8,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 9 -environment(A) | -in_environment(A,appear(efficient_producers,A)) | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,appear(efficient_producers,A)) # label(mp_FM_and_EP_when_EP_appears_34) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -in_environment(sk1,appear(efficient_producers,sk1)) | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,appear(efficient_producers,sk1)). [resolve(9,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 10 -environment(A) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B) | decreases(difference(founding_rate(first_movers,B),founding_rate(efficient_producers,B))) # label(a11_53) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,A) | decreases(difference(founding_rate(first_movers,A),founding_rate(efficient_producers,A))). [resolve(10,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 11 -environment(A) | -in_environment(A,B) | -in_environment(A,C) | -greater_or_equal(C,D) | -greater_or_equal(D,B) | in_environment(A,D) # label(mp_durations_are_time_intervals_41) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -in_environment(sk1,A) | -in_environment(sk1,B) | -greater_or_equal(B,C) | -greater_or_equal(C,A) | in_environment(sk1,C). [resolve(11,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 12 -environment(A) | -subpopulations(B,C,A,D) | -greater(growth_rate(C,D),growth_rate(B,D)) | selection_favors(C,B,D) # label(mp1_high_growth_rates_31) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -subpopulations(A,B,sk1,C) | -greater(growth_rate(B,C),growth_rate(A,C)) | selection_favors(B,A,C). [resolve(12,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 13 -environment(A) | B != critical_point(A) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C) | -greater(C,B) | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,C),growth_rate(first_movers,C)) # label(d1_52) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: A != critical_point(sk1) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,B) | -greater(B,A) | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)). [resolve(13,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 14 -environment(A) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C) | -greater_or_equal(D,B) | -greater_or_equal(C,D) | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,D) # label(a10_50) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,A) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,B) | -greater_or_equal(C,A) | -greater_or_equal(B,C) | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,C). [resolve(14,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 15 -environment(A) | -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B) | greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,B),growth_rate(efficient_producers,B))) | greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,B),growth_rate(efficient_producers,B)),zero) # label(mp_relationship_of_growth_rates_49) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,A) | greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A))) | greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A)),zero). [resolve(15,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98 16 -environment(A) | -in_environment(A,B) | -greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,B),growth_rate(efficient_producers,B)),zero) | -greater_or_equal(C,appear(efficient_producers,A)) | -greater(B,C) | -decreases(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,C),growth_rate(efficient_producers,C))) | greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,C),growth_rate(efficient_producers,C)),zero) # label(mp_decreasing_function_35) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98 Derived: -in_environment(sk1,A) | -greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A)),zero) | -greater_or_equal(B,appear(efficient_producers,sk1)) | -greater(A,B) | -decreases(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,B),growth_rate(efficient_producers,B))) | greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,B),growth_rate(efficient_producers,B)),zero). [resolve(16,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.42/0.99 Function symbol KB weights: efficient_producers=1. sk1=1. first_movers=1. zero=1. sk2=1. growth_rate=1. difference=1. appear=1. founding_rate=1. disbanding_rate=1. critical_point=1. start_time=1.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Given=76. Generated=126. Kept=79. proofs=0.
% 0.42/0.99 Usable=76. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=46. Hints=0.
% 0.42/0.99 Megabytes=0.17.
% 0.42/0.99 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 SEARCH FAILED
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Exiting with failure.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Process 6898 exit (sos_empty) Thu Jun 9 08:01:38 2022
% 0.42/0.99 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------