TSTP Solution File: MGT034-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:10:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : MGT034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 08:27:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C36_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.19/0.37  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.19/0.37  #
% 0.19/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.37  # Number of axioms: 28 Number of unprocessed: 28
% 0.19/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.37  # 28 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 5 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.37  # There are 5 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.37  # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.37  # 5 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.37  # 22 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.37  # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 5
% 0.19/0.37  # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.37  # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.39  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.39  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.39  # 28888 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.39  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.39  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.39  # 28889 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.39  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.39  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.39  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.39  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.39  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (in_environment(sk1,critical_point(sk1)))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (greater(critical_point(sk1),sk2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(sk2,appear(efficient_producers,sk1)))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (~selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (in_environment(X1,start_time(X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (greater_or_equal(appear(first_movers,X1),start_time(X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,critical_point(X1))|~in_environment(X1,critical_point(X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X2))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,appear(efficient_producers,X1))|~in_environment(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X2,X3)|~greater_or_equal(X4,X2)|~in_environment(X1,X4)|~in_environment(X1,X3)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (X1!=critical_point(X2)|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)),zero)|~greater(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1))))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (greater(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1))|~greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)),zero))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (decreases(difference(founding_rate(first_movers,X1),founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|X2!=critical_point(X3)|~greater(X1,X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X3,X1)|~environment(X3))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (selection_favors(X1,X2,X3)|~greater(growth_rate(X1,X3),growth_rate(X2,X3))|~subpopulations(X2,X1,X4,X3)|~environment(X4))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X2,X3)|~greater_or_equal(X4,X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X4)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X3)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|decreases(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~decreases(difference(founding_rate(first_movers,X1),founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1))))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_prod# Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.39  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.39  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.39  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.39  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (in_environment(sk1,critical_point(sk1)))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (greater(critical_point(sk1),sk2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(sk2,appear(efficient_producers,sk1)))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (~selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (in_environment(X1,start_time(X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (greater_or_equal(appear(first_movers,X1),start_time(X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,critical_point(X1))|~in_environment(X1,critical_point(X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X2))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,appear(efficient_producers,X1))|~in_environment(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X2,X3)|~greater_or_equal(X4,X2)|~in_environment(X1,X4)|~in_environment(X1,X3)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (X1!=critical_point(X2)|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)),zero)|~greater(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1))))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (greater(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1))|~greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)),zero))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (decreases(difference(founding_rate(first_movers,X1),founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|X2!=critical_point(X3)|~greater(X1,X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X3,X1)|~environment(X3))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (selection_favors(X1,X2,X3)|~greater(growth_rate(X1,X3),growth_rate(X2,X3))|~subpopulations(X2,X1,X4,X3)|~environment(X4))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X2,X3)|~greater_or_equal(X4,X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X4)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X3)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|decreases(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~decreases(difference(founding_rate(first_movers,X1),founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1))))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)),zero)|~greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X2),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2)),zero)|~greater_or_equal(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X3))|~in_environment(X3,X2)|~decreases(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~greater(X2,X1)|~environment(X3))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)),zero)|greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_355, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.39  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.39  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.39  # Found 4 steps
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_355, plain, (critical_point(sk1)=critical_point(sk1)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_452, plain, (critical_point(sk1)=critical_point(sk1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_49])).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_484, plain, (~environment(sk1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_52])).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_483, plain, (~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,critical_point(sk1)),growth_rate(first_movers,critical_point(sk1)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.19/0.39  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.39  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.39  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.39  ucers,X1)),zero)|~greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X2),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2)),zero)|~greater_or_equal(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X3))|~in_environment(X3,X2)|~decreases(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~greater(X2,X1)|~environment(X3))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)),zero)|greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,X1),growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1)))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_355, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.19/0.39  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.39  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.39  # Found 4 steps
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_355, plain, (critical_point(sk1)=critical_point(sk1)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_452, plain, (critical_point(sk1)=critical_point(sk1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_49])).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_484, plain, (~environment(sk1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_52])).
% 0.19/0.39  cnf(i_0_483, plain, (~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,critical_point(sk1)),growth_rate(first_movers,critical_point(sk1)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.19/0.39  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.39  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.39  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.40  # Child (28889) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.40  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------