TSTP Solution File: MGT027+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT027+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 11.06s 11.27s
% Output   : Refutation 11.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : MGT027+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 11:50:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Thu Jun  9 11:50:55 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 15885.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,17,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.37/0.56  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.37/0.56  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.37/0.56  number of clauses in intial UL: 14
% 0.37/0.56  number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.37/0.56  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 82
% 0.37/0.56  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.37/0.56  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 94
% 0.37/0.56  absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.37/0.56     distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.37/0.56     distinct function count: 5
% 0.37/0.56     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  
% 0.37/0.56  =========== start of search ===========
% 7.65/7.87  
% 7.65/7.87  
% 7.65/7.87  Changing weight limit from 60 to 35.
% 7.65/7.87  
% 7.65/7.87  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 7.65/7.87  
% 7.65/7.87  
% 7.65/7.87  Resetting weight limit to 35 after 635 givens.
% 7.65/7.87  
% 7.94/8.15  
% 7.94/8.15  
% 7.94/8.15  Changing weight limit from 35 to 32.
% 7.94/8.15  
% 7.94/8.15  Resetting weight limit to 32 after 640 givens.
% 7.94/8.15  
% 8.17/8.36  
% 8.17/8.36  
% 8.17/8.36  Changing weight limit from 32 to 30.
% 8.17/8.36  
% 8.17/8.36  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 645 givens.
% 8.17/8.36  
% 8.76/8.99  
% 8.76/8.99  
% 8.76/8.99  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 8.76/8.99  
% 8.76/8.99  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 660 givens.
% 8.76/8.99  
% 9.15/9.37  
% 9.15/9.37  
% 9.15/9.37  Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 9.15/9.37  
% 9.15/9.37  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 670 givens.
% 9.15/9.37  
% 9.88/10.11  
% 9.88/10.11  
% 9.88/10.11  Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 9.88/10.11  
% 9.88/10.11  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 685 givens.
% 9.88/10.11  
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at  10.89 sec ----> 7089 [hyper,7088,14,19] {-} $F.
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  Length of proof is 33.  Level of proof is 23.
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 11.06/11.27  % SZS status Theorem
% 11.06/11.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  1 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,$f1(A,B)),zero)|contracts_from(B,first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  2 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater_or_equal($f1(A,B),B)|contracts_from(B,first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  3 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,$f1(A,B)))|contracts_from(B,first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  4 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,B),zero)| -greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,B),zero)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B).
% 11.06/11.27  5 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(C,B)|in_environment(A,C).
% 11.06/11.27  6 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)|in_environment(A,appear(efficient_producers,A)).
% 11.06/11.27  7 [] {+} -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,C)|greater(A,C).
% 11.06/11.27  8 [] {+} -greater_or_equal(A,B)|greater(A,B)|A=B.
% 11.06/11.27  9 [] {+} greater_or_equal(A,B)| -greater(A,B).
% 11.06/11.27  10 [] {+} greater_or_equal(A,B)|A!=B.
% 11.06/11.27  11 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater_or_equal(B,appear(efficient_producers,A))|greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,B),zero).
% 11.06/11.27  12 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)|greater($f2(A),appear(efficient_producers,A)).
% 11.06/11.27  13 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)| -greater_or_equal(B,$f2(A))|greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,B)).
% 11.06/11.27  14 [] {+} -greater(A,appear(efficient_producers,$c1))| -contracts_from(A,first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  15 [] {-} environment($c1).
% 11.06/11.27  16 [] {-} stable($c1).
% 11.06/11.27  17 [] {-} A=A.
% 11.06/11.27  19 [hyper,16,12,15] {-} greater($f2($c1),appear(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  20 [hyper,16,6,15] {-} in_environment($c1,appear(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  22 [hyper,17,10] {-} greater_or_equal(A,A).
% 11.06/11.27  32 [hyper,19,9] {-} greater_or_equal($f2($c1),appear(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  33 [hyper,19,5,15,16,20] {-} in_environment($c1,$f2($c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  39 [hyper,33,2,15,16] {-} greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),$f2($c1))|contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  40 [hyper,33,1,15,16] {-} greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))),zero)|contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  44 [hyper,32,11,15,33] {-} greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),zero).
% 11.06/11.27  126 [hyper,39,8] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|greater($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),$f2($c1))|$f1($c1,$f2($c1))=$f2($c1).
% 11.06/11.27  1816 [hyper,126,5,15,16,33] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|$f1($c1,$f2($c1))=$f2($c1)|in_environment($c1,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  1834 [para_from,126.3.1,40.1.1.2,factor_simp] {-} greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,$f2($c1)),zero)|contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|greater($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  1835 [para_from,126.3.1,3.4.2.2,unit_del,15,16,33,factor_simp] {-} -greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|greater($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  2133 [para_from,1816.2.1,3.4.2.2,unit_del,15,16,33,factor_simp] {-} -greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|in_environment($c1,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  2197 [hyper,1834,4,15,33,44] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|greater($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),$f2($c1))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  2418 [hyper,2197,7,19] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1))|greater($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),appear(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  2419 [hyper,2197,5,15,16,33] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1))|in_environment($c1,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  3468 [hyper,2418,9] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1))|greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),appear(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  4210 [hyper,3468,11,15,2419,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1))|greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))),zero).
% 11.06/11.27  4897 [hyper,4210,4,15,2419,40,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  5955 [hyper,4897,14,19] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  5967 [hyper,5955,13,15,16,39] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1))|greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))))|contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  6842 [hyper,5967,3,15,16,33,factor_simp] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1))|contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  6843 [hyper,6842,14,19] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  6844 [hyper,6843,13,15,16,22] {-} greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  6850 [hyper,6844,2133] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|in_environment($c1,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  6851 [hyper,6844,1835] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|greater($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  6935 [hyper,6851,7,19] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|greater($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),appear(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  7006 [hyper,6935,9] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f2($c1)),appear(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 11.06/11.27  7022 [hyper,7006,11,15,6850,factor_simp] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))),zero).
% 11.06/11.27  7037 [hyper,7022,4,15,6850,40,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  7058 [hyper,7037,14,19] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))).
% 11.06/11.27  7059 [hyper,7058,13,15,16,39] {-} greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f2($c1))))|contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  7088 [hyper,7059,3,15,16,33,factor_simp] {-} contracts_from($f2($c1),first_movers).
% 11.06/11.27  7089 [hyper,7088,14,19] {-} $F.
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  % SZS output end Refutation
% 11.06/11.27  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  ============ end of search ============
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 11.06/11.27  
% 11.06/11.27  Process 15885 finished Thu Jun  9 11:51:06 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------