TSTP Solution File: MGT022-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : MGT022-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:24:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
environment(sk1),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_5)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_6)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
| decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_7)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
| decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_8)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
| constant(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_9)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
| ~ environment(sk1)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)
| ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))
| increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a6_2)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
| ~ environment(sk1)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)
| ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))
| constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a6_3)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
| ~ decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_constant_not_decrease_1)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
| ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_constant_not_decrease_1)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2_4)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT022-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 07:39:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 % symbols: 16
% 0.19/0.35 % clauses: 10
% 0.19/0.35 % start clauses: 6
% 0.19/0.35 % iterative deepening steps: 24
% 0.19/0.35 % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.19/0.35 % literal attempts: 309
% 0.19/0.35 % depth failures: 173
% 0.19/0.35 % regularity failures: 0
% 0.19/0.35 % tautology failures: 0
% 0.19/0.35 % reductions: 0
% 0.19/0.35 % extensions: 210
% 0.19/0.35 % SAT variables: 111
% 0.19/0.35 % SAT clauses: 104
% 0.19/0.35 % WalkSAT solutions: 97
% 0.19/0.35 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.19/0.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.35 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------