TSTP Solution File: MGT022-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT022-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.56s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : MGT022-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 07:53:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Thu Jun 9 07:53:34 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26300.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.56 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.56 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.56 number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.19/0.56 number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 0.19/0.56 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 0.19/0.56 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.56 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 90
% 0.19/0.56 absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.19/0.56 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.19/0.56 distinct function count: 4
% 0.19/0.56 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.18 sec ----> 17 [hyper,16,1,15] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 1 [] {+} -constant(A)| -decreases(A).
% 0.19/0.56 2 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -greater(resilience(C),resilience(B))| -decreases(resources(A,D))|increases(difference(disbanding_rate(B,D),disbanding_rate(C,D))).
% 0.19/0.56 3 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -greater(resilience(C),resilience(B))| -constant(resources(A,D))|constant(difference(disbanding_rate(B,D),disbanding_rate(C,D))).
% 0.19/0.56 4 [] {+} -increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)).
% 0.19/0.56 6 [] {+} greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)).
% 0.19/0.56 7 [] {+} environment(sk1).
% 0.19/0.56 8 [] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2).
% 0.19/0.56 9 [] {+} decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)).
% 0.19/0.56 10 [] {+} decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.56 11 [hyper,9,2,7,8,6] {+} constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.56 14 [hyper,11,4,factor_simp] {+} constant(resources(sk1,sk2)).
% 0.19/0.56 15 [hyper,14,3,7,8,6] {-} constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.56 16 [hyper,14,1,10] {+} decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.56 17 [hyper,16,1,15] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.56 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 true clauses given 7 (77.8%)
% 0.19/0.56 false clauses given 2
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 FALSE TRUE
% 0.19/0.56 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 Process 26300 finished Thu Jun 9 07:53:34 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------