TSTP Solution File: MGT007-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT007-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MGT007-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:29:55 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.67 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.67 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.67 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.67 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.67 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.67 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.67
% 0.20/0.67 % Result :Theorem 0.040000s
% 0.20/0.67 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.040000s
% 0.20/0.67 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 % File : MGT007-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.20/0.68 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.20/0.68 % Problem : Reproducibility decreases during reorganization.
% 0.20/0.68 % Version : [PB+94] axioms.
% 0.20/0.68 % English :
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.20/0.68 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.20/0.68 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.68 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.20/0.68 % Names :
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.68 % Rating : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.20/0.68 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 17 RR)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of literals : 68 ( 0 equ; 50 neg)
% 0.20/0.68 % Maximal clause size : 11 ( 4 avg)
% 0.20/0.68 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of variables : 54 ( 8 sgn)
% 0.20/0.68 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT007+1.p
% 0.20/0.68 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(mp1_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | reliability(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(mp2_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | accountability(A,sk2(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(mp_not_in_TR_3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | reproducibility(A,sk3(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(a2_FOL_4,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ greater(J,I)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(F,E) ) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(a2_FOL_5,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ greater(J,I)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(H,G) ) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(a2_FOL_6,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ greater(F,E)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ greater(H,G)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(J,I) ) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(a6_FOL_7,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reorganization(A,D,E)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(A,F,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(A,G,C)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(A,H,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(A,I,C)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(D,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(C,E)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(F,G) ) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(a6_FOL_8,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reorganization(A,D,E)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(A,F,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ reliability(A,G,C)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(A,H,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ accountability(A,I,C)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(D,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(C,E)
% 0.20/0.68 | greater(H,I) ) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 organization(sk4,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 organization(sk4,sk8) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 reorganization(sk4,sk9,sk10) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 reproducibility(sk4,sk5,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_13,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 reproducibility(sk4,sk6,sk8) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_14,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 ~ greater(sk9,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_15,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 greater(sk8,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_16,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 ~ greater(sk8,sk10) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 cnf(t7_FOL_17,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 ~ greater(sk5,sk6) ).
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.68 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.68 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.68 %ClaNum:17(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.68 %VarNum:152(SingletonVarNum:54)
% 0.20/0.68 %MaxLitNum:11
% 0.20/0.68 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.68 %SharedTerms:16
% 0.20/0.68 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% 0.20/0.68 %singleGoalClaCount:9
% 0.20/0.68 [1]P1(a1,a6)
% 0.20/0.68 [2]P1(a1,a9)
% 0.20/0.68 [3]P2(a9,a6)
% 0.20/0.68 [4]P4(a1,a7,a6)
% 0.20/0.68 [5]P4(a1,a8,a9)
% 0.20/0.68 [6]P5(a1,a10,a2)
% 0.20/0.68 [7]~P2(a9,a2)
% 0.20/0.68 [8]~P2(a10,a6)
% 0.20/0.68 [9]~P2(a7,a8)
% 0.20/0.68 [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P6(x101,f3(x102,x101),x102)
% 0.20/0.68 [11]~P1(x111,x112)+P3(x111,f4(x112,x111),x112)
% 0.20/0.68 [12]~P1(x121,x122)+P4(x121,f5(x122,x121),x122)
% 0.20/0.68 [15]~P3(x153,x151,x154)+~P3(x155,x152,x156)+~P4(x153,x157,x154)+~P4(x155,x158,x156)+P2(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x154)+~P6(x153,x159,x154)+~P1(x155,x156)+~P6(x155,x1510,x156)+~P2(x157,x158)
% 0.20/0.68 [16]~P6(x163,x161,x164)+~P6(x165,x162,x166)+~P4(x163,x167,x164)+~P4(x165,x168,x166)+P2(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x164)+~P3(x163,x169,x164)+~P1(x165,x166)+~P3(x165,x1610,x166)+~P2(x167,x168)
% 0.20/0.68 [13]~P1(x137,x134)+~P2(x135,x134)+~P3(x137,x132,x135)+~P3(x137,x131,x134)+~P5(x137,x133,x136)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x134)+~P6(x137,x138,x135)+~P6(x137,x139,x134)+P2(x135,x136)+~P1(x137,x135)
% 0.20/0.68 [14]~P1(x147,x144)+~P2(x145,x144)+~P6(x147,x142,x145)+~P6(x147,x141,x144)+~P5(x147,x143,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+P2(x143,x144)+~P3(x147,x148,x145)+~P3(x147,x149,x144)+P2(x145,x146)+~P1(x147,x145)
% 0.20/0.68 [17]~P6(x173,x179,x174)+~P6(x175,x1710,x176)+~P3(x173,x177,x174)+~P3(x175,x178,x176)+~P4(x173,x171,x174)+~P4(x175,x172,x176)+P2(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x174)+~P1(x175,x176)+~P2(x177,x178)+~P2(x179,x1710)
% 0.20/0.68 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P3(a1,f4(a6,a1),a6)),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,12,11])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P6(a1,f3(a6,a1),a6)),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,12,11,10])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(25,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P2(f3(a6,a1),x251)+~P6(a1,x251,a9)+~P3(a1,x252,a9)),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,4,6,7,8,12,11,10,16,15,17,14])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P3(a1,f4(a9,a1),a9)),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12,11])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(41,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P6(a1,f3(a9,a1),a9)),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12,11,10])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(46,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P2(f3(a6,a1),x461)+~P6(a1,x461,a9)),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[39,25])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(48,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P2(f3(a6,a1),f3(a9,a1))),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[41,46])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(50,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P2(f4(a6,a1),f4(a9,a1))),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,7,6,8,19,39,41,2,20,1,46,13])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(90,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 ($false),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,39,20,19,48,50,4,5,41,2,1,17]),
% 0.20/0.69 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.69 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.69 % Total time :0.040000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------