TSTP Solution File: MGT004+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MGT004+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : MGT004+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 09:01:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.51
% 0.18/0.51 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.18/0.51 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.51 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.51 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.51 SPASS derived 151 clauses, backtracked 31 clauses, performed 11 splits and kept 143 clauses.
% 0.18/0.51 SPASS allocated 85457 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.51 SPASS spent 0:00:00.16 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.51 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.51 0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.51 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.51 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.51 0:00:00.04 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.51
% 0.18/0.51
% 0.18/0.51 Here is a proof with depth 11, length 57 :
% 0.18/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.51 1[0:Inp] || -> organization(skc13,skc9)*.
% 0.18/0.51 2[0:Inp] || -> organization(skc13,skc7)*.
% 0.18/0.51 3[0:Inp] || -> greater(skc7,skc9)*.
% 0.18/0.51 4[0:Inp] || -> reorganization(skc13,skc10,skc8)*.
% 0.18/0.51 5[0:Inp] || -> survival_chance(skc13,skc12,skc9)*.
% 0.18/0.51 6[0:Inp] || -> survival_chance(skc13,skc11,skc7)*.
% 0.18/0.51 7[0:Inp] || greater(skc12,skc11)* -> .
% 0.18/0.51 8[0:Inp] || greater(skc10,skc9)* -> .
% 0.18/0.51 9[0:Inp] || greater(skc7,skc8)* -> .
% 0.18/0.51 10[0:Inp] || organization(u,v) -> reliability(u,skf2(v,u),v)*.
% 0.18/0.51 11[0:Inp] || organization(u,v) -> accountability(u,skf3(v,u),v)*.
% 0.18/0.51 12[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* organization(w,u) organization(w,v) accountability(w,x,u)*+ accountability(w,y,v)* reliability(w,z,u)* reliability(w,x1,v)* reorganization(w,x2,x3)* -> greater(u,x3)* greater(x2,v)* greater(y,x)*.
% 0.18/0.51 13[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* organization(w,u) organization(w,v) accountability(w,x,u)*+ accountability(w,y,v)* reliability(w,z,u)* reliability(w,x1,v)* reorganization(w,x2,x3)* -> greater(u,x3)* greater(x2,v)* greater(x1,z)*.
% 0.18/0.51 14[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(w,x)* organization(y,z) organization(x1,x2) survival_chance(y,x3,z)*+ accountability(y,v,z)* reliability(y,x,z)* reliability(x1,w,x2)* accountability(x1,u,x2)* survival_chance(x1,x4,x2)* -> greater(x4,x3)*.
% 0.18/0.51 21[0:Res:2.0,10.0] || -> reliability(skc13,skf2(skc7,skc13),skc7)*.
% 0.18/0.51 22[0:Res:2.0,11.0] || -> accountability(skc13,skf3(skc7,skc13),skc7)*.
% 0.18/0.51 24[0:Res:2.0,13.1] || greater(skc7,u) organization(skc13,u) accountability(skc13,v,u)*+ reliability(skc13,w,u)* reorganization(skc13,x,y)* accountability(skc13,z,skc7)* reliability(skc13,x1,skc7)* -> greater(x,u)* greater(w,x1)* greater(skc7,y).
% 0.18/0.51 25[0:Res:2.0,12.1] || greater(skc7,u) organization(skc13,u) accountability(skc13,v,u)*+ reliability(skc13,w,u)* reorganization(skc13,x,y)* accountability(skc13,z,skc7)* reliability(skc13,x1,skc7)* -> greater(x,u)* greater(v,z)* greater(skc7,y).
% 0.18/0.51 29[0:Res:1.0,10.0] || -> reliability(skc13,skf2(skc9,skc13),skc9)*.
% 0.18/0.51 30[0:Res:1.0,11.0] || -> accountability(skc13,skf3(skc9,skc13),skc9)*.
% 0.18/0.51 36[0:Res:30.0,24.2] || greater(skc7,skc9) organization(skc13,skc9) reliability(skc13,u,skc9)* reorganization(skc13,v,w)* accountability(skc13,x,skc7)* reliability(skc13,y,skc7)* -> greater(v,skc9) greater(u,y)* greater(skc7,w).
% 0.18/0.51 39[0:MRR:36.0,36.1,3.0,1.0] || reliability(skc13,u,skc9)*+ reorganization(skc13,v,w)* accountability(skc13,x,skc7)* reliability(skc13,y,skc7)* -> greater(v,skc9) greater(u,y)* greater(skc7,w).
% 0.18/0.51 41[1:Spt:39.0,39.3,39.5] || reliability(skc13,u,skc9)*+ reliability(skc13,v,skc7)* -> greater(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.51 49[0:Res:22.0,13.3] || greater(skc7,u) organization(skc13,skc7) organization(skc13,u) accountability(skc13,v,u)* reliability(skc13,w,skc7)* reliability(skc13,x,u)* reorganization(skc13,y,z)* -> greater(skc7,z) greater(y,u)* greater(x,w)*.
% 0.18/0.51 50[0:MRR:49.1,2.0] || greater(skc7,u) organization(skc13,u) accountability(skc13,v,u)*+ reliability(skc13,w,skc7)* reliability(skc13,x,u)* reorganization(skc13,y,z)* -> greater(skc7,z) greater(y,u)* greater(x,w)*.
% 0.18/0.51 67[0:Res:11.1,50.2] || organization(skc13,u) greater(skc7,u) organization(skc13,u) reliability(skc13,v,skc7)* reliability(skc13,w,u)* reorganization(skc13,x,y)* -> greater(skc7,y) greater(x,u)* greater(w,v)*.
% 0.18/0.51 70[0:Obv:67.0] || greater(skc7,u) organization(skc13,u) reliability(skc13,v,skc7)*+ reliability(skc13,w,u)* reorganization(skc13,x,y)* -> greater(skc7,y) greater(x,u)* greater(w,v)*.
% 0.18/0.51 71[0:Res:21.0,70.2] || greater(skc7,u) organization(skc13,u) reliability(skc13,v,u)*+ reorganization(skc13,w,x)* -> greater(skc7,x) greater(w,u)* greater(v,skf2(skc7,skc13))*.
% 0.18/0.51 73[0:Res:29.0,71.2] || greater(skc7,skc9) organization(skc13,skc9) reorganization(skc13,u,v)* -> greater(skc7,v) greater(u,skc9) greater(skf2(skc9,skc13),skf2(skc7,skc13))*.
% 0.18/0.51 77[0:MRR:73.0,73.1,3.0,1.0] || reorganization(skc13,u,v)*+ -> greater(skc7,v) greater(u,skc9) greater(skf2(skc9,skc13),skf2(skc7,skc13))*.
% 0.18/0.51 79[0:Res:6.0,14.4] || greater(u,v)* greater(w,x)* organization(skc13,skc7) organization(y,z) accountability(skc13,v,skc7)* reliability(skc13,x,skc7)* reliability(y,w,z)* accountability(y,u,z)* survival_chance(y,x1,z)* -> greater(x1,skc11).
% 0.18/0.51 82[0:MRR:79.2,2.0] || greater(u,v)* greater(w,x)* organization(y,z) accountability(skc13,v,skc7)*+ reliability(skc13,x,skc7)* reliability(y,w,z)* accountability(y,u,z)* survival_chance(y,x1,z)* -> greater(x1,skc11).
% 0.18/0.51 83[2:Spt:77.0,77.1,77.2] || reorganization(skc13,u,v)* -> greater(skc7,v) greater(u,skc9).
% 0.18/0.51 84[2:Res:4.0,83.0] || -> greater(skc7,skc8)* greater(skc10,skc9).
% 0.18/0.51 85[2:MRR:84.0,84.1,9.0,8.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.51 86[2:Spt:85.0,77.3] || -> greater(skf2(skc9,skc13),skf2(skc7,skc13))*.
% 0.18/0.51 104[0:Res:22.0,82.3] || greater(u,skf3(skc7,skc13))*+ greater(v,w)* organization(x,y) reliability(skc13,w,skc7)* reliability(x,v,y)* accountability(x,u,y)* survival_chance(x,z,y)* -> greater(z,skc11).
% 0.18/0.51 129[0:Res:30.0,25.2] || greater(skc7,skc9) organization(skc13,skc9) reliability(skc13,u,skc9)* reorganization(skc13,v,w)* accountability(skc13,x,skc7) reliability(skc13,y,skc7)* -> greater(v,skc9) greater(skf3(skc9,skc13),x)* greater(skc7,w).
% 0.18/0.51 132[0:MRR:129.0,129.1,3.0,1.0] || reliability(skc13,u,skc9)*+ reorganization(skc13,v,w)* accountability(skc13,x,skc7) reliability(skc13,y,skc7)* -> greater(v,skc9) greater(skf3(skc9,skc13),x)* greater(skc7,w).
% 0.18/0.51 134[3:Spt:132.1,132.4,132.6] || reorganization(skc13,u,v)* -> greater(u,skc9) greater(skc7,v).
% 0.18/0.51 135[3:Res:4.0,134.0] || -> greater(skc10,skc9) greater(skc7,skc8)*.
% 0.18/0.51 136[3:MRR:135.0,135.1,8.0,9.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.51 137[3:Spt:136.0,132.0,132.2,132.3,132.5] || reliability(skc13,u,skc9)*+ accountability(skc13,v,skc7) reliability(skc13,w,skc7)* -> greater(skf3(skc9,skc13),v)*.
% 0.18/0.51 138[3:Res:29.0,137.0] || accountability(skc13,u,skc7)+ reliability(skc13,v,skc7)* -> greater(skf3(skc9,skc13),u)*.
% 0.18/0.51 141[3:Res:22.0,138.0] || reliability(skc13,u,skc7)*+ -> greater(skf3(skc9,skc13),skf3(skc7,skc13))*.
% 0.18/0.51 142[3:Res:21.0,141.0] || -> greater(skf3(skc9,skc13),skf3(skc7,skc13))*.
% 0.18/0.51 204[3:Res:142.0,104.0] || greater(u,v)* organization(w,x) reliability(skc13,v,skc7)* reliability(w,u,x)* accountability(w,skf3(skc9,skc13),x)*+ survival_chance(w,y,x)* -> greater(y,skc11).
% 0.18/0.51 210[3:Res:30.0,204.4] || greater(u,v)* organization(skc13,skc9) reliability(skc13,v,skc7)* reliability(skc13,u,skc9)* survival_chance(skc13,w,skc9)* -> greater(w,skc11).
% 0.18/0.51 211[3:MRR:210.0,210.1,41.2,1.0] || reliability(skc13,u,skc7)*+ reliability(skc13,v,skc9)* survival_chance(skc13,w,skc9)* -> greater(w,skc11).
% 0.18/0.51 213[3:Res:21.0,211.0] || reliability(skc13,u,skc9)*+ survival_chance(skc13,v,skc9)* -> greater(v,skc11).
% 0.18/0.51 215[3:Res:29.0,213.0] || survival_chance(skc13,u,skc9)* -> greater(u,skc11).
% 0.18/0.51 223[3:Res:5.0,215.0] || -> greater(skc12,skc11)*.
% 0.18/0.51 224[3:MRR:223.0,7.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.51 225[1:Spt:224.0,39.1,39.2,39.4,39.6] || reorganization(skc13,u,v)*+ accountability(skc13,w,skc7)* -> greater(u,skc9) greater(skc7,v).
% 0.18/0.51 231[1:Res:4.0,225.0] || accountability(skc13,u,skc7)* -> greater(skc10,skc9) greater(skc7,skc8).
% 0.18/0.51 232[1:MRR:231.1,231.2,8.0,9.0] || accountability(skc13,u,skc7)* -> .
% 0.18/0.51 233[1:UnC:232.0,22.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.51 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.51 Formulae used in the proof : t4_FOL mp1 mp2 a6_FOL a1_FOL
% 0.18/0.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------