TSTP Solution File: MGT001-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.68s
% Output : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : MGT001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:14:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35 Thu Jun 9 08:14:47 2022
% 0.13/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 32391.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.35 in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.49 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.49 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.49 number of clauses in intial UL: 10
% 0.18/0.49 number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.18/0.49 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 52
% 0.18/0.49 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 68
% 0.18/0.49 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.49 absolute distinct symbol count: 19
% 0.18/0.49 distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.18/0.49 distinct function count: 3
% 0.18/0.49 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.46/0.68 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.68 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.28 sec ----> 30 [binary,29.1,10.1] {-} $F.
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 Length of proof is 10. Level of proof is 4.
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.46/0.68 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.68 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 1 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|reliability(A,sk1(B,A),B).
% 0.46/0.68 2 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|accountability(A,sk2(B,A),B).
% 0.46/0.68 3 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|reproducibility(A,sk3(B,A),B).
% 0.46/0.68 4 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -survival_chance(A,I,B)| -survival_chance(C,J,D)| -greater(F,E)| -greater(H,G)|greater(J,I).
% 0.46/0.68 5 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -reproducibility(A,I,B)| -reproducibility(C,J,D)| -greater(J,I)|greater(F,E).
% 0.46/0.68 6 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -reproducibility(A,I,B)| -reproducibility(C,J,D)| -greater(J,I)|greater(H,G).
% 0.46/0.68 9 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reorganization_free(A,B,B)| -reorganization_free(C,D,D)| -reproducibility(A,E,B)| -reproducibility(C,F,D)| -inertia(A,G,B)| -inertia(C,H,D)| -greater(H,G)|greater(F,E).
% 0.46/0.68 10 [] {+} -greater(sk11,sk10).
% 0.46/0.68 11 [] {+} organization(sk4,sk6).
% 0.46/0.68 12 [] {+} organization(sk5,sk7).
% 0.46/0.68 13 [] {+} reorganization_free(sk4,sk6,sk6).
% 0.46/0.68 14 [] {+} reorganization_free(sk5,sk7,sk7).
% 0.46/0.68 15 [] {+} inertia(sk4,sk8,sk6).
% 0.46/0.68 16 [] {+} inertia(sk5,sk9,sk7).
% 0.46/0.68 17 [] {+} survival_chance(sk4,sk10,sk6).
% 0.46/0.68 18 [] {+} survival_chance(sk5,sk11,sk7).
% 0.46/0.68 19 [] {-} greater(sk9,sk8).
% 0.46/0.68 20 [hyper,11,3] {+} reproducibility(sk4,sk3(sk6,sk4),sk6).
% 0.46/0.68 21 [hyper,11,2] {+} accountability(sk4,sk2(sk6,sk4),sk6).
% 0.46/0.68 22 [hyper,11,1] {+} reliability(sk4,sk1(sk6,sk4),sk6).
% 0.46/0.68 23 [hyper,12,3] {+} reproducibility(sk5,sk3(sk7,sk5),sk7).
% 0.46/0.68 24 [hyper,12,2] {+} accountability(sk5,sk2(sk7,sk5),sk7).
% 0.46/0.68 25 [hyper,12,1] {+} reliability(sk5,sk1(sk7,sk5),sk7).
% 0.46/0.68 26 [hyper,23,9,11,12,13,14,20,15,16,19] {-} greater(sk3(sk7,sk5),sk3(sk6,sk4)).
% 0.46/0.68 27 [hyper,25,6,11,12,22,21,24,20,23,26] {-} greater(sk2(sk7,sk5),sk2(sk6,sk4)).
% 0.46/0.68 28 [hyper,25,5,11,12,22,21,24,20,23,26] {-} greater(sk1(sk7,sk5),sk1(sk6,sk4)).
% 0.46/0.68 29 [hyper,28,4,11,12,22,25,21,24,17,18,27] {-} greater(sk11,sk10).
% 0.46/0.68 30 [binary,29.1,10.1] {-} $F.
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.46/0.68 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 ============ end of search ============
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 true clauses given 14 (77.8%)
% 0.46/0.68 false clauses given 4
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 FALSE TRUE
% 0.46/0.68 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.46/0.68
% 0.46/0.68 Process 32391 finished Thu Jun 9 08:14:47 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------