TSTP Solution File: MGT001-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : MGT001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:24:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 20 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 67 ( 0 equ; 41 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(mp1_1,axiom,
( ~ organization(X,Y)
| reliability(X,sk1(Y,X),Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp1_1) ).
cnf(mp2_2,axiom,
( ~ organization(X,Y)
| accountability(X,sk2(Y,X),Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp2_2) ).
cnf(mp3_3,axiom,
( ~ organization(X,Y)
| reproducibility(X,sk3(Y,X),Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp3_3) ).
cnf(a1_FOL_4,hypothesis,
( ~ organization(X,Y)
| ~ organization(Z,U)
| ~ reliability(X,V,Y)
| ~ reliability(Z,W,U)
| ~ accountability(X,X1,Y)
| ~ accountability(Z,Y1,U)
| ~ survival_chance(X,Z1,Y)
| ~ survival_chance(Z,U1,U)
| ~ greater(W,V)
| ~ greater(Y1,X1)
| greater(U1,Z1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1_FOL_4) ).
cnf(a2_FOL_5,hypothesis,
( ~ organization(X,Y)
| ~ organization(Z,U)
| ~ reliability(X,V,Y)
| ~ reliability(Z,W,U)
| ~ accountability(X,X1,Y)
| ~ accountability(Z,Y1,U)
| ~ reproducibility(X,Z1,Y)
| ~ reproducibility(Z,U1,U)
| ~ greater(U1,Z1)
| greater(W,V) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2_FOL_5) ).
cnf(a2_FOL_6,hypothesis,
( ~ organization(X,Y)
| ~ organization(Z,U)
| ~ reliability(X,V,Y)
| ~ reliability(Z,W,U)
| ~ accountability(X,X1,Y)
| ~ accountability(Z,Y1,U)
| ~ reproducibility(X,Z1,Y)
| ~ reproducibility(Z,U1,U)
| ~ greater(U1,Z1)
| greater(Y1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2_FOL_6) ).
cnf(a3_FOL_9,hypothesis,
( ~ organization(X,Y)
| ~ organization(Z,U)
| ~ reorganization_free(X,Y,Y)
| ~ reorganization_free(Z,U,U)
| ~ reproducibility(X,V,Y)
| ~ reproducibility(Z,W,U)
| ~ inertia(X,X1,Y)
| ~ inertia(Z,Y1,U)
| ~ greater(Y1,X1)
| greater(W,V) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a3_FOL_9) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_10,negated_conjecture,
organization(sk4,sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_10) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_11,negated_conjecture,
organization(sk5,sk7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_11) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_12,negated_conjecture,
reorganization_free(sk4,sk6,sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_12) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_13,negated_conjecture,
reorganization_free(sk5,sk7,sk7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_13) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_14,negated_conjecture,
inertia(sk4,sk8,sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_14) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_15,negated_conjecture,
inertia(sk5,sk9,sk7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_15) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_16,negated_conjecture,
survival_chance(sk4,sk10,sk6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_16) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_17,negated_conjecture,
survival_chance(sk5,sk11,sk7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_17) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_18,negated_conjecture,
greater(sk9,sk8),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_18) ).
cnf(t1_FOL_19,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(sk11,sk10),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_FOL_19) ).
cnf(20,plain,
reliability(sk5,sk1(sk7,sk5),sk7),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[mp1_1,t1_FOL_11]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
reliability(sk4,sk1(sk6,sk4),sk6),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[mp1_1,t1_FOL_10]) ).
cnf(22,plain,
accountability(sk5,sk2(sk7,sk5),sk7),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[mp2_2,t1_FOL_11]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
accountability(sk4,sk2(sk6,sk4),sk6),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[mp2_2,t1_FOL_10]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
reproducibility(sk5,sk3(sk7,sk5),sk7),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[mp3_3,t1_FOL_11]) ).
cnf(25,plain,
reproducibility(sk4,sk3(sk6,sk4),sk6),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[mp3_3,t1_FOL_10]) ).
cnf(26,plain,
greater(sk3(sk7,sk5),sk3(sk6,sk4)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[a3_FOL_9,25,t1_FOL_10,t1_FOL_11,t1_FOL_12,t1_FOL_13,24,t1_FOL_14,t1_FOL_15,t1_FOL_18]) ).
cnf(27,plain,
greater(sk2(sk7,sk5),sk2(sk6,sk4)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[a2_FOL_6,26,t1_FOL_10,t1_FOL_11,21,20,23,22,25,24]) ).
cnf(28,plain,
greater(sk1(sk7,sk5),sk1(sk6,sk4)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[a2_FOL_5,26,t1_FOL_10,t1_FOL_11,21,20,23,22,25,24]) ).
cnf(29,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[a1_FOL_4,27,t1_FOL_10,t1_FOL_11,21,20,23,22,t1_FOL_16,t1_FOL_17,t1_FOL_19]),28]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : MGT001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:14:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.46 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 "."
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T08:14:47
% 0.18/0.46 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-06-09T08:14:47
% 0.18/0.52
% 0.18/0.52
% 0.18/0.52 #||
% 0.18/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.52 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.52 ||#
% 0.18/0.52
% 0.18/0.52 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.18/0.52 ; 40 formulas have been input or derived (from 28 formulas).
% 0.18/0.52 ; 29 (72%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.18/0.52 ; 29 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.18/0.52 ;
% 0.18/0.52 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.006 10% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.001 2% Assert (19 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.005 8% Process new row (38 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.024 41% Resolution (54 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (27 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (9 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.001 2% Forward subsumption (9 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (9 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (6 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Forward simplification (38 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (29 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.022 37% Other
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.059 Total
% 0.18/0.52 ; 0.063 Real time
% 0.18/0.52 ;
% 0.18/0.52 ; Term-hash-array has 50 terms in all.
% 0.18/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 9 entries (9 at peak, 9 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.52 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 24 nodes (24 at peak, 24 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.52 ; Retrieved 4 possibly forward subsuming rows in 9 calls.
% 0.18/0.52 ; Retrieved 2 possibly backward subsumed rows in 9 calls.
% 0.18/0.52 ; Path-index has 58 entries (58 at peak, 58 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.52 ; Path-index has 183 nodes (183 at peak, 183 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.52 ; Trie-index has 58 entries (58 at peak, 58 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.52 ; Trie-index has 146 nodes (146 at peak, 146 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.52 ; Retrieved 10 generalization terms in 21 calls.
% 0.18/0.52 ; Retrieved 19 instance terms in 19 calls.
% 0.18/0.52 ; Retrieved 9,253 unifiable terms in 5,160 calls.
% 0.18/0.52 ;
% 0.18/0.52 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.18/0.52 ; 1 with value (4 12)
% 0.18/0.52 Evaluation took:
% 0.18/0.52 0.063 seconds of real time
% 0.18/0.52 0.059953 seconds of user run time
% 0.18/0.52 0.003264 seconds of system run time
% 0.18/0.52 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.18/0.52 0 page faults and
% 0.18/0.52 5,089,424 bytes consed.
% 0.18/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.18/0.52 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T08:14:47
% 0.18/0.52 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.18/0.52 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------